NASA’s New Budget Means it Won’t Be Going Back to the Moon Any MassNews Soon

It seems that 1966 was an excellent year for consumers. Only 42 cents would get you a gallon of milk. For 30 cents, a pack of cigarettes would cost you. And a gallon of gas—which today is topping $5 in some places as the war in Ukraine and the cutoff of Russian oil push prices higher—went for just 31 cents.

And what, just for the record, did it cost to finance the greatest space program in the history of the world—a space program that went from a standing start in 1961 to having boots on the moon in 1969? The highest level of NASA annual funding during the 64 year history of the agency was $5.93 billion. All of this is influenced by inflation. In 2022, the same 42-cent milk gallon will be $3.68. NASA’s $5.93 billion annual allowance, similarly, would translate to $51.66 billion this year.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

That generous annual funding is worth contemplating this week when, as SpaceNews reports, Congress completed work on an omnibus spending bill that allocates the space agency just over $24 billion dollars—or $760 million less than the White House requested, and less than half of what the space agency was getting back in its golden era.

Details of the bill show a lot about how it has been over 50 years since the first human landing on the moon. In 2020, NASA requested $3.4 billion to build its Human Landing System (HLS)—a 21st century lunar module to carry astronauts down to the surface of the moon from lunar orbit. Congress responded with a check for just $850 million, barely enough for basic R&D. This year NASA lowered its sights, requesting $1.195 billion—and getting it. That’s good as far as it goes, but remains less than half of what NASA needs to build the ship for real. If you want to know why that much-touted 2024 date for getting boots back on the moon—under the new Artemis program—has slipped to a more generalized “sometime this decade,” look no further than the HLS.

Then too, there’s the SLS (the 21st century Saturn V moon rocket), which is budgeted at just $2.6 billion for 2022, a funding level that allows for launching one rocket per year. Back in the Apollo days, 11 Saturn Vs were launched—nine of them on crewed lunar missions—from just 1968 to 1972. Similarly, the Orion spacecraft—the modern-day version of the Apollo orbiter—was budgeted at just $1.4 billion this year. Orion, which has not yet been manned by a crew has been in the works since 2004, and is currently in various stages of development. In contrast, from 1968 to 1974 15 Apollo capsules were used for carrying 15 different crews.

Yes, the government does have its priorities when it comes to spending. And if the decision has been made that space is a lower-tier enterprise than it was half a century ago, that that is within Congress’s authority. But please, no more promises of crewed moon landings in 2024 or even 2025 or 2026 if you’re not going to cut the checks to make the missions possible. Either you talk about the moon, or you spend the money to go. Washington’s choice is not easy.

Original publication of this article was TIME Space. Register here.


Related Articles

Back to top button