The U.K. Is Putting More Pressure on Russian Oligarchs. Critics Say It Comes Too Late

The U.K. government promised to step up efforts prevent the flow of what Prime Minister Boris Johnson called “dirty money” this week, with Fast-tracked Measures introduced to Parliament, brought forward in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Johnson said that the rules, which have been in the works for several years, put supporters of Russian President Vladimir Putin “on notice.”

“There will be nowhere to hide your ill-gotten gains,” Johnson said in a Statement. The U.K.’s National Crime Agency Estimates that money laundering costs the U.K. more than £100 billion ($133 billion) every year. These are the facts. Times of London stated that Washington officialsDue to Russian dirty cash circulating within the U.K., there were concerns that the U.K. would impose enough sanctions.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Johnson’s revamped economic crime bill, introduced Feb. 28, will require anonymous foreign owners of U.K. property and companies to reveal their identity, to ensure that kleptocrats cannot hide behind shell companies. The bill will also cap the legal costs that law enforcement would incur while trying to seize oligarchs’ assets.

In his Tuesday’s State of the Union Address, President Joe Biden spoke out about U.S. plans for sanctioning Russian oligarchs. “We’re joining with European allies to find and seize their yachts and luxury apartments, their private jets,” he said. “We’re coming for your ill-begotten gains.”

Continue reading: What Biden’s Sanctions on Russia Will Actually Do

Economic crime bill in the United Kingdom is too low, too late

Campaigners and experts say the U.K.’s reform is long overdue and doesn’t go far enough. Parliamentary bureaucracy could hold up progress for months—while Russian troops advance further into Ukraine within days. “There’s definitely a sense of too little too late,” says Thomas Mayne, a research fellow at the think-tank Chatham House, specializing in corruption studies. “Oligarchs feel their money is safe here.”

London’s position as a global financial hub, combined with a friendly regulatory environment and its proximity to Russia has made the city an appealing location for some Russian oligarchs and Kleptocrats. Billionaires were able to purchase luxury properties and send their kids to costly schools. private schoolsThe U.K. Often With little to no scrutiny about their source of wealth. The scheme was available to wealthy investors until last month. This allowed them to fast track their application to reside in the U.K.

After confronting ridiculeJust for the initial sanctioning Three Russian oligarchs, five banksJohnson increased the number of companies and individuals on his list, adding eight more oligarchs. Johnson also The golden visa system was canceled, which since its inception in 2008 has allowed wealthy foreign investors the option to settle in Britain if they have at least £2 million ($2.7 million) to invest in the U.K. British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said on Monday that the government was working through a “hit list”Weitere oligarchs have links with the Kremlin.

UK Opposition legislators have Only two individuals were named on the list, which includes 35 oligarchs as well as others that support the Putin regime. They are identified by a jailed Russian opposition leader. Alexei NavalnyThe U.K. has placed them on its sanctions list. Roman Abramovich, a billionaire, former Russian politician and owner of Chelsea Football Club, is one of the people named on Navalny’s list. Abramovich was a member of the Navalny’s list. deniedClose to Tie Putin and the Kremlin

Continue reading: Putin is afraid of the Man

Abramovich said that he hasn’t been sanctioned by the government and that he was not subject to any. StatementOn Wednesday, he put up for auction Chelsea Football Club. He is also reported to beTry to sellHe owns properties in London. Chris Bryant (UK Labour Party Lawmaker) stated in Parliament Wednesday, that Abramovich is “terrified of being sanctioned, which is why he’s already going to sell his home tomorrow and sell another flat as well.”Keir Sternmer is also the Labour Party leader questionedOn Wednesday, the Prime Minister asked why Abramovich is not under sanctions.

Transparency is lacking

AnalyseTransparency International UK is an anti-corruption organization has found at least £1.5 billion ($2 billion) worth of U.K. property owned by Russians accused of financial crime or with links to the Kremlin. Of that amount, £830 million ($1.1 billion) is This analysis showed that the majority of the companies owned are those registered in British overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies.It is possible that the actual figure will be significantly higher. However, this does not account for the complexity of the current system. There are few obstaclesFor setting up shell businesses Information about the financial wealth of kleptocrats can often be obtained only through data breaches, like the Pandora PapersPublication from last year.

Because there is no transparency in British property markets, it means dirty money could be moving around unrecognized. Rachel Davies Teka is the head of advocacy at Transparency International UK. Also, it cThis impedes sanctions’ effectiveness. “You can’t actually freeze assets, if you don’t know where they are,” she says.

Continue reading: ​​U.S.A. and E.U. Are Going After Putin’s Wealth. They Must First Find It

Transparency International UK discovered evidence that luxury London development are empty by comparing electricity use and voting records. “There are thousands and thousands of homes typically across London that are essentially empty safety deposit boxes,” says Davies Teka.

It is possible that requiring foreign buyers to register their identity when purchasing properties in the U.K. could make it more difficult for criminals or kleptocrats hide their wealth through luxury developments. Transparency International UK is not. Points out that a loophole will allow companies that hold property to register themselves as having “no beneficial owner.” This allowance has reportedly already been UsedAccording to Open Democracy, money laundering or concealing assets can be done on Companies House’s U.K. Business Register. Starmer reports that 18 months from the date of the bill’s passage, the registration requirement for property owners will be in effect. said is “far too long for the Ukrainian people.” In Parliament Wednesday, he asked Johnson, “Why are we giving Putin’s cronies 18 months to quietly launder their money out of the U.K. property market and into another safe haven?”

Transparency International UK stated in a statement, that at least one owner of each property must be notified. 6,096 propertiesThey will not have to register ownership if they were bought after 20 years. It also informed the Guardian that the U.K.’s £500 ($668)-per-day fine for non-compliance is “small change for those with deep pockets”.

Limiting legal enforcement costs

The economic crime bill also addresses concerns that law enforcers were being deterred from seizing oligarchs’ assets by the risk of incurring extremely high legal costs—the current investigative powers, known as unexplained wealth orders, have reportedly only been used by the U.K.’s National Crime Agency four timesSince their introduction in 2018, To encourage more enforcement, the bill contains a limit on these costs.

Matt Ingham, a lawyer specializing in unexplained wealth orders, says that prosecutors often struggle to prove their suspicions that an oligarch obtained their assets illegally because the individual’s home country can refute the claims. “British authorities still have a stumbling block in the form of uncooperative foreign regimes who may not wish to assist for political reasons,” he said.

Bankers, lawyers, and accountants who provide advice to oligarchs, criminals, and dictators are also a part of the advisory team. criticizedfor permitting the movement of dirty money throughout the U.K. Money laundering is a crime that requires professionals to be licensed to report it.WatchdogIn the past, the National Crime Agency claimed that legal professionals have not done so. Mayne, Davies Teka and others argue that these so-called enablers are often not deterred from handling illicit assets because of their self-regulatory nature.

Continue reading: Here’s What the New, Tightened SWIFT Sanctions on Russian Banks Actually Do

A combination of intense political focus on the Russian invasion, the strengthening of law enforcement’s resources, and companies’ increased focus on environmental, social and governance commitments may deter oligarchs’ usual network of enablers, says Timothy Ash, an economist focusing on emerging markets. Whether the shift in the U.K.’s stance on Russian-owned assets is enough to help Ukraine is another matter, observers like Mayne argue. “It could be several years or months later. change isn’t really good enough when we’re trying to crack down on Russian money now to prevent further incursions into Ukraine,” he says.


Related Articles

Back to top button