Federal judges ruled that social media platforms don’t have a constitutional right to “muzzle” speech
A US appeals court has cleared the way for Texas to begin enforcing a landmark anti-censorship law, ruling that Twitter, Facebook and other social media giants don’t have a constitutional right to silence opinions that they find objectionable.
On Friday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals of New Orleans issued its decision. It rejected what was called “an”. “odd inversion of the First Amendment”Silicon Valley trade associations, which argued that Texas, by preventing social media companies censoring objectionable opinions, infringed their freedom to speech.
“The platforms argue that buried somewhere in the person’s enumerated right to free speech lies a corporation’s unenumerated right to muzzle speech,”In its ruling, the panel consisted of three members. This claim has many implications. “staggering,” the judges added, inasmuch as it would mean that email providers, mobile-phone carriers and banks could cancel the accounts of anyone who sent a message, made a phone call or donated money in support of a “disfavored” political party, candidate or business.
“Today, we reject the idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say,” the judges said, noting that a platform could obtain a dominant market position by billing itself as open to everyone – as Twitter did by claiming to be “the free speech wing of the free speech party” – then turn around and dictate the conversation as “the monopolist of the modern public square.”
HB20, which prohibits platforms with more than 50 million users from censoring content posted by residents of the state based on viewpoint, marks one of the boldest efforts by Republican-controlled states to push back against Big Tech’s alleged anti-conservative bias. Texas had argued that Silicon Valley went so far as to muzzle federal elected officials – such as President Donald Trump – and even censored a congressional hearing that featured disfavored viewpoints.
The platforms responded to the concerns but argued the law will prohibit them from censoring. “pro-Nazi speech, terrorist propaganda and Holocaust denial.”These claims were described by the appellate court as “fanciful hypotheticals”He said that Texas law allows companies to prohibit speech that encourages crime or makes threats.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton called Friday’s ruling a “massive victory for the constitution and free speech.”
BREAKING: I just secured a MASSIVE VICTORY for the Constitution & Free Speech in fed court: #BigTechCANNOT censor any Texan’s political opinions! The 5th Circuit “reject[s]The idea that corporations can censor people’s words because they have the First Amendment rights to free speech. pic.twitter.com/UijlzYcv7r
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) September 16, 2022
Silicon Valley trade groups have vowed to appeal to the US Supreme Court, which has previously refused to allow HB20 to go into effect until a lower court had ruled on the merits of the case – which the Fifth Circuit just did.
Share this story via social media