Ignored Alerts, Dirty Deposits: How U.S. Banks Missed a Billion-Dollar Laundering Scheme
Chinese Laundering Cells and Mexican Drug Cartels Exploited Compliance Failures in America’s Biggest Banks—And Got Away With It for Years

LOS ANGELES — A billion-dollar money laundering scheme involving Mexican drug cartels and Chinese underground banking networks infiltrated the U.S. financial system through loopholes, lax compliance, and institutional inaction.
The scandal, now under joint federal investigation, exposes systemic flaws that allowed hundreds of millions in drug proceeds—often delivered in plastic bags or gym duffels—to be deposited at teller windows in plain sight, without triggering the safeguards designed to stop financial crime.
Internal compliance alerts were triggered, red flags were raised, but they were ignored, case after case.
This is the story of how America’s largest financial institutions—including Bank of America, Citibank, and JPMorgan Chase—missed or dismissed clear signs of international laundering activity, allowing violent cartels to wash drug profits with frightening ease.
How It Worked: The “Mirror Laundering” Model
The laundering scheme capitalized on a perfect marriage of criminal incentives.
- Mexican cartels needed to convert vast U.S. cash profits from fentanyl and cocaine into usable funds outside the country.
- Wealthy Chinese nationals, constrained by China’s capital controls, were desperate to move money overseas.
The solution is a mirror laundering system using Chinese intermediaries inside the United States. These brokers accept cash from cartel operatives and deposit it into U.S. accounts—often through dozens of daily deposits across multiple banks and branches. In return, Chinese clients in China transfer equivalent amounts (in yuan) to the money launderers, completing the cycle.
No physical funds crossed borders, and no international wires raised suspicion. The banks simply recorded legitimate-looking cash deposits—hundreds of millions of dollars worth.
The Deposits No One Questioned
Federal affidavits reveal an unsettling pattern: six-figure cash deposits repeatedly made at retail branches throughout Los Angeles, the San Gabriel Valley, and Orange County, often in hours.
Tellers routinely accepted:
- $180,000 in crisp $100s in a Target shopping bag
- $250,000 deposited in 20 bundles, each under $10,000
- Multiple deposits under different names into the same business account
Most deposits were just under the $10,000 reporting threshold, a classic “structuring” tactic to avoid triggering CTRS (Currency Transaction Reports). In some cases, deposits were made by foreign nationals who spoke little or no English, could not explain the nature of their businesses, or presented questionable forms of ID.
Compliance software flagged them.
Internal alerts were generated.
But bank risk teams failed to investigate—or chose to look the other way.
Case Study: $90 Million Through Citibank and Chase
In one case documented in a 2024 federal indictment, the laundering ring led by Xiang “Leo” Wu, a Chinese national residing in Arcadia, funnelled over $90 million in cartel cash into Citibank and Chase accounts.
According to court documents:
- Deposits were made across 22 branches over 14 months.
- Accounts were opened under fake import-export companies and cleaning services.
- Internal risk systems flagged these accounts 74 times, but no suspicious activity reports (SARS) were ever filed.
A senior compliance officer at one bank allegedly overrode the alerts, citing “customer familiarity” and “lack of external complaints.”
Wu was arrested in late 2023. He has pleaded not guilty and is awaiting trial.
Institutional Inaction and Repeated Oversight Failures
Experts say this isn’t a technology failure—it’s a failure of will.
Modern banks employ advanced transaction monitoring algorithms designed to detect suspicious patterns. But algorithms don’t act—people do.
In many of the cases under investigation:
- Banks failed to link related accounts showing similar deposit activity.
- Branch-level employees lacked training or incentives to report suspicious behaviour.
- Mid-level compliance staff were overwhelmed, under-resourced, or incentivized to maintain customer satisfaction over enforcement.
In one leaked internal audit, a major bank cited in the investigation admitted that its system allowed “deposit-heavy” clients to bypass review queues because they were flagged as “premium customers.”
Financial Institutions Under Scrutiny
Although federal investigators have not formally charged any banks involved, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have launched multiple reviews. Civil penalties and regulatory sanctions are being considered for “willful negligence” and “pattern failures in AML (Anti-Money Laundering) enforcement.”
Congress has taken notice.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), a vocal critic of weak AML enforcement, stated, “This isn’t just about criminals exploiting loopholes—it’s about banks ignoring alarms. It’s willful blindness in pursuit of quarterly profits.”
Multiple financial watchdog organizations have called for new mandatory reporting guidelines, especially around repetitive structured deposits, cash-heavy small businesses, and foreign nationals opening accounts with minimal documentation.
Case Study: The “University Launderers”
In another case, six Chinese nationals on student visas were recruited via WeChat to open accounts and receive bulk cash in California. Over 9 months, they deposited a combined $15 million in narcotics proceeds into Bank of America and Citibank branches.
The students were paid $5,000 per month to serve as runners. Each had no business operations but claimed “e-commerce” or “consulting services.” When questioned by Homeland Security Investigations, they admitted they were told they were helping “relatives in China get around taxes.”
All six have since pleaded guilty and are cooperating with federal prosecutors.
Systemic Problems and the Need for Reform
According to Amicus International Consulting, which advises on financial integrity and compliance protocols globally, these failures are symptoms of a broader problem: institutions prioritizing ease of business over risk management.
“This was not a sophisticated laundering method,” said an Amicus compliance expert. “These were cash deposits—literal bags of drug money—made at teller windows. If a bank’s controls can’t catch that, they’re not controls. They’re window dressing.”
Amicus recommends the following reforms for banks under increasing AML scrutiny:
- Real-time deposit behaviour analysis linked across branches.
- Tiered compliance escalation for accounts flagged multiple times.
- Enhanced KYC (Know Your Customer) protocols for high-risk industries.
- AI-assisted account link analysis to detect network laundering patterns.
- Mandatory independent audits for high-volume cash deposit clients.
The Ripple Effect: Beyond the Banks
Every dollar laundered through these banks empowers the deadly fentanyl trade. The CDC reports over 100,000 drug overdose deaths in 2024, with fentanyl responsible for nearly 70%.
When cartel proceeds are “cleaned” and moved back to drug suppliers, it funds:
- Larger narcotics shipments
- Bribes and violence across the U.S.-Mexico border
- Corruption and instability in Latin America
- Human trafficking, arms dealing, and cybercrime
Banks, whether knowingly complicit or negligently blind, become part of this lethal cycle.
Amicus International Consulting: Protecting Financial Integrity
Amicus International Consulting works with financial institutions, governments, and private entities to ensure transparency, compliance, and protection from exposure to criminal finance.
Services include:
- Forensic audits of high-risk accounts
- Anti-money laundering training for branch-level staff
- Secure offshore banking for verified, legal clients
- Identity verification for international clients
- Risk mitigation strategies in high-cash sectors
“Our goal is to help clients stay on the right side of regulation—and reality,” says a senior consultant. “Because in today’s world, ignorance is not just dangerous. It’s illegal.”
Conclusion: A Crisis of Accountability
The billion-dollar laundering operation exposed in Los Angeles is not just a story of cartels and criminals—it is a cautionary tale of institutional apathy. When internal systems scream “danger” and no one listens, it’s only a matter of time before dirty money becomes normalized.
If America’s banks don’t learn from these failures, the next wave of launderers won’t even need bags of cash.
They’ll use shell companies, crypto wallets, and deepfake IDS—and by then, the teller window may be the last place anyone notices.

📞 Contact Information
Phone: +1 (604) 200-5402
Email: info@amicusint.ca
Website: www.amicusint.ca
Follow Us:
🔗 LinkedIn
🔗 Twitter/X
🔗 Facebook
🔗 Instagram
Amicus International Consulting – Strengthening legal frameworks, preventing financial abuse, and defending global accountability.