Fate of controversial slave trader statue revealed — Analysis

The We Are Bristol Historical past Fee has concluded that the statue of Edward Colston ought to be placed on show

An impartial citywide session into the way forward for the lately toppled statue of Bristol slave dealer Edward Colston has concluded it ought to be housed in a museum.

The advice offered by the We Are Bristol Historical past Fee is that the statue is completely displayed horizontally and nonetheless lined with paint, preserving the broken state it was in when it was retrieved from the harbor into which it was dumped.

80% of Bristolians surveyed said that the statue ought to go on show. Of the one in 5 people who didn’t need the statue to be displayed, half of that group needed it to be returned to the plinth, whereas 1 / 4 of these people thought it ought to be destroyed.

The ‘Colston Four’ verdict is a licence for woke vandalism

The report said that the plinth which beforehand housed the statue ought to be used to show momentary items or actions that mirror points which can be essential for Bristolians, together with the historical past and affect of the slave commerce. It also needs to stay empty at instances to remind folks passing by of what occurred to the statue.

Through the seventeenth century, Colston was a shareholder within the Royal African Firm, which shipped 84,000 Africans – together with 12,000 youngsters – into slavery.

The Colston statue was torn down by Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 earlier than it was thrown into the Bristol harbor in opposition to his function as a slave dealer.

4 activists who have been accountable for ripping the statue off its plinth have been cleared of felony wrongdoing in January after urging jurors to “be on the fitting facet of historical past.”

You’ll be able to share this story on social media:



Related Articles

Back to top button