Why Congress’ Meeting with Zelensky Might Complicate Life For Biden

This article is part of the The DC Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up HereGet stories such as this delivered to your email inbox

The Democrats maintained a relentless focus on their cause throughout the fall 2006. critique of the Bush Administration’s handling of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan abroad and the handling of Hurricane Katrina at home. Public opinion was extremely positive WearyYou are struggling to find a solution. National AnxietyThe President George W. Bush was also there StuckPolling was in the middle of 30s. The result of Bush’s final at-bat with voters in the midterms that year was a resounding “Thumping” for his party, to borrow the President’s own word.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

From coast to coast, the post-9/11 wars proved to be a political problem for Republicans. Electoral upsets became as frequent as they were unexpected. In fact, so off-guard was then-Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean about the routing Republicans took in New Hampshire in 2006 that he couldn’t even muster the name of the candidate who oustedA GOP incumbent is considered safe. “Anyone remember who I’m talking about?” Dean the day after Carol Shea-Porter’s upset. “The First District of New Hampshire? I can’t think of the last part of the hyphenated name. … Carole?”

So when Nancy Pelosi prepared to claim the Speakership in early 2007 for the first time, she didn’t want war planning—especially the execution of complicated and toxic wars—to wrap its ugly arms around Democrats. She used her intelligence to be savvy rejectedThe Left side demanded that wartime funds for troops be cut, just as others had requested. The liberal blogosphere—this was, after all, pre-Twitter—Irresistible that “Pelosi has thrown in the towel.” She similarly shutdown TalkBush who, at that time, was an inept lame-duck on his return to Texas. She could read the mood in the country and both her caucus. No matter how loud the voices in her tent screamed, it was clear that the environment wasn’t right for such an experiment. Sixteen years ago, Pelosi understood the wisdom of keeping a foreign war’s execution at an arm’s length when an unpopular Republican was in the White House.

America now has a president who is able to make America great again SurveysIt is hard to complain about a Congress that has united control over Washington and has strong opinions about its execution of foreign policies. However, this time sending U.S. aid to the war on Ukraine is not an option. It is very popular. Or at the very least, it is popular If notAmerican troops have been deployed. It’s a different calculus for Pelosi and Democrats now, and Congress is ready to weigh in on how the President should respond to conflict abroad more forcefully than it did during the Bush years.

However, the risks to Congress and White House are not yet eliminated.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and attacks on civilians have galvanized Americans in a way Fallujah never did. American citizens are overwhelmingly surveyed in surveys RallyingUkraine and France share the same affinity levels as Germany and France for Ukraine. A Reuters poll Discover more more than 60% of Americans saying they’re Are you willing?You can pay more to support the Ukrainian government in crisis. There are Make callsTo get Ukraine more air power, Congress will use a variety of bipartisan and disparate corners (mostly ignoring that Russia is already in the Air Power category). Any country sending MiGs from Kyiv to another country will be considered as a wartime-boer.

It is in this context that Volodymyr, the Ukrainian president, was born. ZelenskyVideo conference will be used to meet U.S. legislators Wednesday. Zelensky had already met with Congressmembers via Zoom. During which time he asked them to get involved. Cashand weapons caches. Lawmakers did so last week, AdditionSpend $3.5 billion on military expenditures, 4 billion for humanitarian aid, and $3 billion to send troops to Europe.

Zelensky is likely to ask for additional assistance tomorrow morning when he meets with lawmakers. The U.S. still hasn’t imposed the no-flyHe will only accept the protection he needs. U.S. officials have been consistent in telling reporters and Zelensky alike that the no-fly zone wouldn’t solve the country’s problems, perhaps increasing tensions and escalating the situation instead. But with cities buried in rubble and airstrikes unrelenting, any shred of help is worth seeking if you’re the Ukrainian leader.

Zelensky has proven an inspiring leader, effectively rallying the world to Ukraine’s cause. Zelensky has many talents. FansCongress has become so much more divided than it seems that there may even be a Zelensky Caucus. This could be the place that unites all. The American electorate is not like that of Iraq or Afghanistan. It is really These images of violence from Ukraine must stop. This has caused uncomfortable reactions. ConversationsAmericans are more concerned about foreign life than Americans think. Images of Europeans under siege have made the polls more popular than images showing Afghan or Iraqi mother’s fleeing from shelling. It’s morally indefensible but politically unignorable.

So, this is what makes the situation so uncomfortable DynamicIs Congress able to replace the White House when it comes to formulating foreign policies? Bipartisan Delegations of lawmakers have already been visiting Poland’s border with Ukraine to see the refugee crisis for themselves. While calls once were reserved only for Foreign Relations Committee Chairs, rank-and–file members can make these calls. Congress has always been there to help in war- and peace-related matters since 9/11. Flexible for Zelensky—perhaps with more enthusiasm than a tempered Biden, who has ruled out sending troops to defend Kyiv.

Congress, which is often known for being a force of will and long-term thinking, might be willing to push the envelope, creating a potential conflict between Democrats in Congress (the Democratic Capitol) and Democrats at the White House. They could then go into midterm elections fighting each other over what appears to be a minor issue. It is very popularUkrainians in need of assistance

However, one respected observer of politics is right. WarningThe glow’s half-life may not last long and could be gone before Election Day. With an overseas effort going sour, and predicting a complete sweep for the minor party, it is possible that 2006’s dynamics will repeat. It doesn’t matter if the Republicans on the Hill are pushing just as hard to increase support to Ukraine as the Democrats; they aren’t in charge. And, in that, there’s a lesson for Washington right now: what is popular in one moment may be toxic in short order, especially if Americans who against all fact expect wars to be tidy finally learn that such conflicts are seldom so neat. The wars in Afghanistan/Iraq were also popular when they began, but both sides eventually did the thing that liberals charged Pelosi with doing in 2006. Throwing in the towel was the best option. Only friction between Pennsylvania Avenue at both ends complicates this calculation.

Washington is the place to be. Register for D.C. Brief Newsletter


Related Articles

Back to top button