The OECD Crackdown: How TINs Are Central to Ending Global Tax Evasion

VANCOUVER, Canada — A new chapter in global tax governance is underway. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has escalated its efforts to dismantle transnational tax evasion networks with the expansion of its Common Reporting Standard (CRS) enforcement, placing the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) at the heart of a coordinated assault on anonymity.

This move, hailed by some as the final blow to offshore secrecy, is shaking the foundations of old wealth protection models while prompting governments, banks, and tax havens to redefine their compliance obligations. But in the shadows, legal experts and high-net-worth individuals are retooling privacy strategies to adapt to this new landscape.

The New OECD Mandate: A Unified Global Framework

As of 2025, the OECD has adopted sweeping enhancements to the CRS, requiring financial institutions across 126 jurisdictions to report more granular data linked to foreign accounts, including digital wallets and beneficial ownership of passive entities.

At the core of this mandate is the expanded requirement for financial institutions to validate and verify Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs) for every non-resident account holder. A TIN, once viewed as a localized identifier, is now the backbone of a globally linked surveillance system designed to track the movement of capital in real-time.

“The TIN is no longer just a domestic tax tool—it’s now a passport to global transparency,” said a former compliance officer for a European multinational bank. “And if it’s missing, mismatched, or manipulated, the account is flagged or frozen.”

Why TINs Matter More Than Ever

TINs—unique numerical identifiers assigned to taxpayers—have historically enabled tax agencies to match income, deductions, and payments across systems. In the global context, they now serve as digital anchors in the web of automatic information exchange.

TINs are pivotal for:

• Matching offshore income to domestic returns
• Linking multiple accounts across jurisdictions
• Identifying shell corporations and ultimate beneficial owners
• Unmasking residents attempting to hide behind foreign incorporation

Through its updated framework, the OECD now requires not only a valid TIN but one that is consistent with residency declarations, beneficial ownership filings, and historical tax behaviour.

The Fall of Secrecy Jurisdictions

The OECD’s latest report identifies several jurisdictions that have reformed under the pressure of CRS and G20 blocklists. Traditional tax havens, such as Panama, the Bahamas, and the British Virgin Islands, have now adopted mandatory TIN verification procedures.

Case Study: Panama’s Shift to Transparency
In response to OECD scrutiny, Panama implemented stringent Know-Your-Customer (KYC) reforms in 2024, including mandatory Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) disclosures for account openings. 

This policy resulted in a 17% decline in new account registrations. It triggered the closure of numerous accounts held by non-compliant foreign clients, many of whom failed to provide valid Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs).

Meanwhile, financial secrecy is waning as jurisdictions risk being labelled “non-cooperative,” resulting in restrictions from international banking partners and sanctions from trade organizations.

Digital Assets: The New Tax Frontier

TIN reporting obligations are now expanding into the cryptocurrency ecosystem. The OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), effective January 2025, requires exchanges and wallet providers to collect Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs) from users and share them with relevant tax authorities through a new automatic exchange pipeline.

“Crypto has lost its anonymity,” said an Amicus International employee. “With CARF and CRS working in tandem, blockchain transactions are increasingly subject to identity verification through TINs.”

Case Study: Hidden Bitcoin Wallet Exposed by TIN Match
A French tax evader using a Seychelles-registered cryptocurrency exchange was unmasked after investigators linked a dormant cryptocurrency wallet to his French Tax Identification Number (TIN), which he had unknowingly submitted during the Know Your Customer (KYC) verification process. The evidence formed the basis of a €1.8 million tax evasion case.

Beneficial Ownership Registers: TIN-Linked and Public

Global pressure has also led to a wave of beneficial ownership registers—public or semi-public databases that reveal who truly controls legal entities and trusts.

Most OECD-compliant nations now require beneficial owners to be registered, along with their national Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs). This connects offshore corporate structures back to the real individuals behind them.

How the TIN Makes Ownership Visible:

• Multinational corporations: Forced to declare UBOs with matching TINs across jurisdictions
• Trust structures: Trustees, protectors, and beneficiaries must list their TINs
• Banking passports and second citizenship holders: Required to provide multiple TINs if dual resident

These reforms directly threaten wealth-shielding strategies that relied on nominee directors or silent partners to obscure control.

Amicus Insight: Legal Privacy vs. Evasion

While transparency is increasing, Amicus International Consulting emphasizes the difference between illegal evasion and lawful privacy.

“There is a clear distinction between hiding assets and protecting them legally,” says an employee of Amicus. “We work within the system, structuring clients’ international lives so they remain compliant while minimizing exposure and risk.”

Services offered by Amicus often include:

• Structuring dual residencies with clear TIN jurisdictions
• Securing banking passports in tax-cooperative states
• Establishing lawful offshore trusts with properly disclosed UBOs
• Creating travel-friendly legal identities that preserve access without violating reporting requirements

Cross-Border Investigations and AI-Powered TIN Matching

Tax agencies now use artificial intelligence and machine learning to analyze cross-border financial activity. These tools automatically match transactions to TINs and flag inconsistencies.

Examples of flagged behaviour include:

• A declared TIN in Canada, but income deposits into Singaporean banks
• Non-declared offshore trusts controlled by TIN-linked email accounts
• Real estate purchases in Dubai by individuals who failed to declare foreign holdings in their country of residence

AI systems enhance both tax collection and criminal investigation by predicting where undeclared assets are likely to be held, based on known TIN activity and lifestyle analysis.

Case Study: Ayitey Ayayee-Amim and the Corporate Cloak

The Ghanaian-American investment advisor, Ayitey Ayayee-Amim, was accused of running an unregistered investment scheme in Georgia. 

Utilizing layered corporate entities across multiple Caribbean nations, Ayayee-Amim allegedly failed to report taxable income to the IRS, thereby circumventing FATCA by avoiding personal TIN registration on offshore accounts.

However, leaked documents revealed an internal transfer involving a U.S. Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) linked to a dormant LLC he had once owned, which was overlooked during his asset reorganization. 

This digital footprint reopened investigations and highlighted how even a minor TIN mistake can unravel elaborate evasion networks.

Treaty Reinforcement: Tax Data Exchange as a Standard Clause

New tax treaties now include mandatory TIN verification and annual exchange clauses. If an individual has economic interests in multiple countries, tax authorities automatically share their Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs) and related financial information.

Treaties now extend to:

• Permanent Establishments: Any local income source must be TIN-linked and declared
• Dual Citizens: Must report in both jurisdictions with matching TINs
• Foreign Directors: Corporate control roles now require valid, verifiable TINs

In 2025 alone, over 58 million cross-border data exchanges occurred under the OECD’s CRS framework.

Second Passports and the TIN Trap

Many individuals seeking asset protection or mobility turn to second citizenship programs. However, this approach now carries greater scrutiny.

Most reputable programs—such as those in Malta, Antigua and Barbuda, and Vanuatu—require the declaration of all existing TINs during the application process. Failure to do so can result in disqualification, passport revocation, or automatic reporting to the original tax authorities.

Case Study: Dual Citizenship Disclosure Failure
A Russian entrepreneur acquired a Caribbean passport but failed to disclose his Russian Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). When the second jurisdiction shared data with the OECD, its omission triggered an automatic investigation in Russia, leading to a criminal tax evasion case and an asset freeze across three countries.

Stateless Strategies: A Legal Grey Zone

Some high-net-worth individuals have attempted to renounce their citizenship, too, to nullify their Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs) entirely. However, most countries impose “exit tax” obligations, requiring full asset disclosure and tax settlement before accepting renunciation.

Additionally, TINs are still required in many stateless or transitional financial processes, particularly where residency continues to imply reporting obligations.

Amicus International has noted an uptick in clients exploring:

• Non-domiciled residency in low-tax jurisdictions
• Trust relocation to TIN-light jurisdictions
• Combining diplomatic appointments with structured transparency

These strategies aim to respect the spirit of compliance while maintaining lifestyle flexibility.

The Final Evolution: From Evasion to Integration

The OECD’s crackdown, centred on the TIN, signals a shift in global tax culture. Taxpayers are no longer able to “opt out” of the system by moving offshore, purchasing new passports, or hiding behind nominee accounts.

Instead, global citizens must now integrate their financial strategies across jurisdictions, embracing compliance while maximizing lawful advantages.

Firms like Amicus International play a crucial role in this evolution, offering legal restructuring services that align clients with the new transparency standards while preserving their financial integrity.

📞 Contact Information
Phone: +1 (604) 200-5402
Email: info@amicusint.ca
Website: www.amicusint.ca

Follow Us:
🔗 LinkedIn
🔗 Twitter/X
🔗 Facebook
🔗 Instagram