Texas Primary Unfolds as Advocates Sound the Alarm About Mail Ballot Rejections

Pam Gaskin has been handing out campaign flyers since she was nine years old—the year, she says, that she was first allowed to walk down the street without supervision. Gaskin, now 74 and Fort Bend County resident, is an active member of League of Women Voters.

She says this year is different. An expansive voting law that Texas enacted earlier this year has led to widespread confusion among voters attempting to vote by mail in today’s primary, leading to sky-high ballot-application and ballot rejection rates, according to local election officials. “I know how to read and follow directions,” Gaskin says. “This is a form that is designed incorrectly.”
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Harris County, which is home to Houston, reported on Feb. 22 that nearly a third of the mail ballots they’ve received have been rejected, due to the state’s new ID requirements, according to the county election office’s spokesperson. Many voters who are not accustomed to providing their driver’s license numbers or the last four digits of their social security numbers have left the fields blank, while others have provided accurate ID numbers that do not necessarily match what election officials have on file.

The result, election officials say, is an “alarmingly high” rejection rate.

The Texas primary was hampered by problems with the mail ballot, which sank it to March 1. This cycle’s first national primary is a challenge for Attorney General Ken Paxton. He faces many well-known opponents, including George P. Bush (grandson of George H.W.). Bush and Eva Guzman (an ex-Texas Supreme Court Justice) are among the candidates on Trump’s down ticket. On the Democratic side, Beto O’Rourke is expected to push through as a candidate for governor, while several progressive Democrats, backed by U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, are vying for key congressional seats.

Learn More What’s Next After Republicans Block Voting Rights Bill?

Officials from Harris County wrote to the Department of Justice on Feb. 17 to complain about the excessive number of votes-by-mail rejections. The letter noted that as of Feb. 15, 14% of the 33,270 vote-by-mail applications that Harris County received had been flagged for rejection because of the new law’s identification requirements and 41% had been flagged for rejection for any reason, including voter identification requirements. A high rejection rate was observed for mail ballots. 35.5% were rejected due to new ID requirements as of February 15.

“The rejection rates should not be anywhere near that high and it’s more akin to what we see in authoritarian states, not in free and fair elections,” says James Slattery, a senior staff attorney with the Texas Civil Rights Project. And it’s not just Harris County but counties across the state that are reporting relatively higher rejection rates, he adds.

Gaskin who claims that she’s voted in every election in her lifetime was denied twice her application for a mail ballot. Gaskin filled out an obsolete form, which the county provided on their website. The second time, she included her driver’s license number, rather the the last four digits of her social security number, on her application. Her records didn’t match because her ID had been used more than forty years ago when she registered to vote.

Learn More The Voting Rights Battle Isn’t Over. It’s Just Leaving D.C.

That’s a common problem, Harris County election officials say. “Either people are not filling out the field altogether or they’re putting the last four digits of their social security number but it doesn’t match what we have on record. It could be accurate but it’s not on file,” says Leah Shah, a spokesperson for the Harris County Elections Administrator’s office.

It is possible that the issue will not only be a problem for Texas. Iowa and a few other states have considered similar provisions to Texas’s law. These provisions also require voters to provide additional identification for mailing ballots and take other steps. Voting rights advocates claim that this has led to confusion. “The absurdity of other states enacting the same requirements while this state is melting down is just crazy,” says Slattery. “It’s an alarm bell now that these bills are popping up in other states. If Texas is somehow seen as a model, you’re going to see mass disenfranchisement across the country.”

In the past, stricter voter ID requirements have resulted in higher mail rejection rates. Arkansas established an ID law in 2014. This required that voters submit a copy their photo ID to mail their ballot. Absentee ballot rejections increased from 3% to nearly 6% after 2012.

Florida’s legislature scaled back a proposal similar to Texas’ on Feb. 22 that would have added similar ID requirements and an additional envelope following criticism from voting rights groups in the state who pointed at Texas as an example of how the measure could go wrong. Lawmakers then changed the bill language to instead direct the secretary of state to work on a plan that would “prescribe the use of a Florida driver license number, Florida identification card number, Social Security number, or any part thereof to confirm the identity of each elector returning a vote-by-mail ballot.”

Learn More Congress shifts focus to electoral count reform

Sylvia Albert, director of voting and elections at Common Cause, describes provisions like the Texas one and accompanying voting restrictions as “death by a thousand cuts.” “When you put so many restrictions on the election that a certain percentage of people can’t vote or don’t have votes counted then the election is no longer a reflection of the will of the people,” Albert says.

Liz Avore, vice president of law and policy at the Voting Rights Lab explains that “there are a lot of states that securely verify absentee ballots without this type of requirement. But there are ways to implement this type of requirement better than how Texas has been handling it.”

“A critical piece of access to democracy is having your vote counted when it’s cast,” Avore says. “That’s something Texas is failing its citizens. Something states should be considering when passing new restrictions is properly taking time to implement them and putting in funding and effort.”

Slattery argues that the situation in Texas could have been avoided if Congress had passed federal legislation such as the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which could have blocked Texas’ expansive voting law from taking effect. “We are going through this because 50 Republican Senators—and Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema—decided that the filibuster was more important than protecting voters.”

Texas’ polls close at 8 PM E.T. The results will be available within 24 hours in most parts of Texas.


Related Articles

Back to top button