Publisher apologizes for book naming Anne Frank betrayal suspect — Analysis

The Dutch writer of a guide which accuses a Jewish man of “more than likely” betraying Anne Frank to the Nazis in 1944 has apologized to “anybody who feels offended” and stopped printing additional copies.

Ambo Anthos – which publishes the Dutch model of ‘The Betrayal of Anne Frank: A Chilly Case Investigation’ by Rosemary Sullivan – has expressed concern that not sufficient work was performed to make sure Jewish Council of Amsterdam member Arnold van den Bergh was for sure the person who betrayed Frank and her household.

In a letter on Monday, the writer stated that “the conclusions of the research… are being questioned by a number of researchers.” Ambo Anthos apologized that the guide has provoked “such a response” and admitted that it was “not doable to evaluate all particulars of the arguments” within the guide “for correctness or substantiation.”

We provide our honest apologies to anybody who feels offended by the guide

“We understand that we now have gained momentum by the worldwide publication and {that a} extra important stance may have been taken right here,” the writer claimed, including that it was “ready for solutions from the analysis group to the questions which have arisen” and can be “delaying the choice to print” extra copies.

Anne Frank betrayal suspect named

The choice to delay additional printing is not going to have an effect on copies of the guide in different languages, together with English, which aren’t revealed by Ambo Anthos.

Whereas many researchers and historians agreed that it was probably van den Bergh offered out the Frank household to the Nazis in an effort to guard his personal, others expressed skepticism over the claims and argued there was not sufficient proof.

You may share this story on social media:



Related Articles

Back to top button