Montpelier Board Elects 11 Descendants of Slaves

ORANGE, Va. — The board that manages former President James Madison’s Montpelier estate in Virginia elected 11 new members representing descendants of people once enslaved there.

Monday’s vote came two months after the board had retracted a commitment to share power with a group representing African Americans who trace their roots to the historic estate.

New members were selected from 20 nominees submitted last month by the Montpelier Descendants Committee, a nationwide group drawn from the descendants’ community of the Orange County, Virginia, historic site, the Culpeper Star-Exponent reported.

The new board members include scholars, historians, two university deans and former CNN anchor Soledad O’Brien. These new members will be responsible for managing Madison’s house, known as “father of the Constitution”, his wife Dolley, their enslaved workers, and the management of Madison’s fourth president.

The committee and the foundation’s new appointees invited the candidates who were not chosen to join an advisory council so they all can help, said Cultural Heritage Partners, a law firm representing the descendants committee. The candidates all agreed to participate.

Learn More A new report reveals that the history of Native American board schools is even more complicated than it appears.

According to Greg Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners’ general counsel, the board has now 25 members.

The board reappointed James French, the committee’s elected chair, and Stephanie Meeks, former president and CEO of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, to second terms. It is the property of the trust.

More than 11,000 people, including Montpelier visitors and donors, signed a petition protesting the foundation’s earlier actions to rescind its June 2021 decision on power-sharing, and to fire and suspend pro-parity staff members with decades of professional experience, including the site’s archaeology director and curatorial vice president.

Dozens of organizations expressed outrage about the board’s retreat. The groups ranged from an organization of descendants of Japanese American citizens interned during World War II to an international association of “sites of conscience” that includes Holocaust museums.

Read More From Time

Reach out to usSend your letters to


Related Articles

Back to top button