Sen.
Lynch (D-South Boston) and Realators at Odds Over Condo Conversion Legislation
"The Tenant Protection Act of 1999" allows communities to limit private
property rights
State
House News Service
MAY 17, 1999--After hearing only opposition
to a rental housing emergency bill, the chairmen of the Legislature's Housing
and Urban Development Committee did not seem inclined to rush ahead today
with a plan that would put a crimp on trendy condominium conversions.
The Tenant Protection Act of 1999 filed by Sen. Stephen Lynch (D-South
Boston) enables communities to declare a rental housing emergency due
to
concerns over condo conversions, the scarcity and affordability of
rental
housing, and the overall conditions in the housing market.
Once an emergency is declared, officials could limit the number of rental
units that could be converted to condos to no more than 20 percent
of the
overall number of rental units in a town.
Lynch, who did not testify at today's hearing, is concerned about a
disappearing affordable rental market in his district, where rents are
rising and apartments are being converted into condos. The Lynch bill
was
rapped by Massachusetts Association of Realtors general counsel Stephen
Ryan.
For many, Ryan said, the only way out of the housing crunch is through
ownership. For some, condominiums are an affordable option to
buying
freestanding single family homes. While Lynch hopes his bill
will address
affordability concerns, Ryan opposes it for the same reason.
"Historically, the purchase of condominiums has been for many folks
the
only way to own their own place if they want to stay in a city," Ryan
said.
"We believe the senator's concerns about housing affordability are
genuine, without question. We differ on what approach in the long
term is going to be better for . . . creating opportunities for home ownership."
"We have some serious concerns about this proposal," Ryan added.
After the hearing, committee chairmen Sen. Stephen Pangiotakos (D-Lowell)
and Rep. Robert Koczera (D-New Bedford) pointed out the lack of formal
support for the bill at today's hearing.
"We didn't hear anything," said Koczera. "We'll look at it carefully."
Koczera feels the 1983 condo law works well. "We have a rather
good condo conversion law on the books," he said. "It addresses aspects
of conversion issues fairly well, fairly adequately."
Said Pangiotakos, "It's a new bill. We're going to take a close
look at it."
According to the Massachusetts Association of Realtors, condo sales
increased 38 percent during the first quarter of 1999. The average
condo
selling price was $139,104. The association feels sales are up
so much
this year because more renters are realizing they can buy a home or
condo.
Reached by phone this afternoon, Lynch said his bill, if passed, would
need
to be adopted in a particular city or town to take effect. That
local option provision makes it less controversial, he said. "Towns
that don't want it, cities that don't want it, don't adopt it," Lynch said.
Naming Boston and Cambridge, he predicted about five of the state's
351
municipalities would consider limiting condo conversions. "If you look
at
what's happening in Cambridge and Boston, you see there's a need for
this,"
said Lynch. "From what I've seen, we need to do something.
The market is
not working. We're seeing massive gentrification. Across this
city,
neighborhoods are being destroyed and the common denominator across
this is the ability to pay. That's unfortunate. The disappearance
of affordable
housing is going to affect our city for a long time."
Condo conversions are "proceeding at an alarming rate" in South Boston,
the
South End, East Boston, Charlestown, and parts of Dorchester, Lynch
said
That means fewer rentals and more condos that are still unaffordable
to
many renters. He added that delaying conversions for six or eight months
is
not a severe burden.
Lynch said those in the city who talk about making it an affordable
place
for working families "need to put action behind their words." He added,
"That may sound odd in a day when everything is moved by the markets, but
I
think there's a need for balance here."
Lynch also downplayed the fact that no one supported the bill at its
public
hearing. "Most of that stuff happens in caucus anyway," he said,
referring
to the private meetings senators have to hash out agreements and air
their
concerns about public policy questions.
|