|
Harvard Medical School
Continues to Back False Research; Says U.S. Boys Are in Crisis
Read
letter from MassNews publisher to Harvard spokesmen
By Atty.
J Edward Pawlick
September 2001
Harvard Medical School has
not yet backed down from its press release that there is a “national
crisis” about boys even though the research for such a claim has
never been published. Many are now questioning whether any valid
research was ever done.
The sensational press release
in June 1998 received national attention and many say has been used
to damage boys and to change the way they are treated in schools
across the nation.
The press release told about
research from Harvard’s famous “expert” on boys, Dr. William Pollack,
who wrote the bestseller, Real Boys, Rescuing Our Sons from the
Myths of Boyhood.
None of the spokesmen for
Harvard have replied to a letter sent by this newspaper about their
current position on Dr. Pollack and his research.
Students Thought Research Was a ‘Farce’
This newspaper revealed in
its July issue that the boys at Belmont Hill School were the teenagers
who were used for the research, and those students thought that
Pollack’s survey, which reportedly employed coercion, was a farce.
“No one around me took the
exam seriously with such one-sided and leading questions being asked,”
one former pupil told MassNews. “The test turned into a complete
farce when kids began shouting out their answers to their classmates
in an effort to make a joke.”
The letter from MassNews was
sent to three persons at Harvard. They are Bruce Cohen, President
of the school’s McLean Hospital; Margaret Dale, Assistant Dean for
Faculty Affairs; and Carolyn Connelly, director of the medical school’s
office for research protection.
Pollack Is a Feminist
Prof. Howard Schwartz of Oakland
University says that the MassNews revelations about Pollack’s research
confirm what he suspected already. “The only question is how much
of his interviews Pollack made up. I suspect it was a lot.”
Schwartz added that the new
information did nothing to reduce his uneasiness about the standards
that Pollack applies to his work. “His data were collected in a
very questionable fashion from an extremely non-representative sample
of boys. It makes the head spin to think that he has generalized
his findings into a full blown diagnosis of cultural crisis. It
is becoming increasingly difficult to take Dr. Pollack seriously.”
A professor of organizational
behavior, Prof. Schwartz studies the psychodynamics of political
correctness and is publishing a new book on the subject. He sees
that Pollack’s underlying goal is “to provide a theoretical basis
for social engineering, for a certain kind of parenting – from a
feminist perspective.”
He says, “Pollack sees no
particular [positive] meaning in the role of the father. His images
of fathers are just about uniformly negative. The whole idea behind
the revolution in parenting that he is trying to bring about is
[the notion] that the traditional family is throwing boys into distress
by raising them to be like their fathers rather than like women.”
Pollack’s research came under
attack last year in a book by Prof. Christina Hoff Sommers, of the
American Enterprise Institute. She wrote in The War Against Boys
that we are turning against boys as the result of research that
is “riddled with errors.”
“On June 4, 1998,” she wrote,
“McLean Hospital, the psychiatric teaching hospital of the Harvard
Medical School, issued a two-page press release announcing the results
of a new study of boys. The release ... reported that researchers
at McLean and Harvard Medical School found that ‘psychologically
“healthy” middle-class boys’ are anxious, alienated, lonely and
isolated - ‘despite appearing outwardly content.’”
Harvard Spokesmen Told Different Story
According to a recent edition
of Insight magazine, Dr. Cohen told it that Pollack’s research was
not sponsored by the hospital although Cohen was president when
the press release was issued.
Insight said, “This contradicts
both Pollack’s book and the 1998 press release announcing a ‘McLean
study’ declaring that boys feel ‘sadness about growing up to be
men, a study by researchers at McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical
School has shown.’”
Cohen also downplayed the
link to Harvard and referred the reporter for the magazine to the
Assistant Dean for Faculty Affairs, Margaret Dale, who stated, “To
the best of my knowledge, Pollack’s research was not a Harvard study.”
The director of the medical
school’s office for research protection, Carolyn Connelly, told
the magazine, “Pollack’s study was not under Harvard Medical School
jurisdiction and was not approved by HMS.” However, Pollack claims
in the credits printed in the book that it was “derived in part
from ... my ongoing research project at Harvard Medical School.”
Both Cohen and Connelly reiterated
to Insight that “issues” about the research had arisen previously
and Pollack had been instructed not to link the McLean or Harvard
names to his research. “But one would have to say it’s a little
late,” said the magazine. “McLean and Harvard did, after all, share
the glory when the New York Times and the network-news celebrities
rushed to hear their professor on the need to feminize American
boys before they blow us up.”
Reminded of the 1998 Press
Release, Cohen said he’d have to talk with public relations about
announcements of “non-McLean studies.” Pollack’s book cites the
research assistance of the hospital’s chief librarian and four employees
who typed Pollack’s manuscript.
|
The
letter sent to three Harvard spokesmen:
Bruce
Cohen, M.D.
Harvard Medical School
McLean Hospital
Belmont, Massachusetts
Dear
Dr. Cohen:
As
you are aware, Insight magazine has written in a
recent issue that Harvard appears to be backing away
from the research of Dr. William Pollack.
In
order that we may report this story accurately, would
you please be kind enough to advise whether or not
Insight reported its conversations with you accurately
and whether you continue to stand behind all of what
was said in Harvard’s June 1998 press release.
Massachusetts
News reaches over 10,000 persons daily on our website
and we distribute over 150,000 copies of our monthly
print edition around the state. We desire to report
this story accurately. We believe it is of extreme
importance because we believe Dr. Pollack has misled
millions of people across the country by the use of
your good name. We have offered to print in full
anything he wishes to write about this, but he has not
chosen to respond. I am enclosing a copy of the
article that appeared in our August print edition.
Thank
you for your help.
Sincerely,
J. Edward Pawlick, Publisher
|
|