The message from Harvard about making boys more like girls got a lot of press including this article in Newsweek where Dr. Pollack told the world that men and boys are in serious trouble and we must correct the “problem” by changing the basic nature of boys in our public schools. But Dr. Pollack refuses to show his “research” to anyone.


This pediatrician, Ron Schneebaum, became so distressed with what our schools are doing to children, particularly boys, by putting them on Ritalin and other drugs that he quit his practice in order to fight this abuse of children. We reported that a well-known consumer group, CHADD, which was promoting the use of Ritalin, had secretly been given $900,000 to do so by the manufacturer of the drug.

 


The scandal about sexual activity by teenagers being encouraged at Fistgate reached into the Governor’s office because of our reporting, but Paul Cellucci refused to talk about the issue. This mistake almost cost him the position as Ambassador to Canada. It is unclear how much Jane Swift has profited from this lesson.

Massachusetts Begins Reform

By Atty. J. Edward Pawlick
October 2001

We officially burst onto the scene in January 1999 when all the TV stations in Boston arrived on my doorstep one afternoon.

Chet Curtis announced on Channel 5 that night that we had created a “firestorm of controversy across the state.” The people on Channel 7 said we were their “Top Story” of the night.

What had we done?

We had merely published a pamphlet about what is being taught in our schools. We called for “An Intelligent Discussion about Homosexuality. Will Massachusetts Listen?” (We had only an Internet site and did not have a print paper at the time.)

We did indeed ignite a “firestorm” and we immediately faced a strong attack from the establishment which tried to dismiss us as a one-issue newspaper.

This all occurred because the daily newspaper in New Bedford (which is part of a chain owned by the Wall Street Journal) had published a diatribe with the headline, “The long sorry history of Christian bigotry continues unabated.”

Although I had been a staunch believer in God for most of my adult life, I had never been a leader in any church. But this hate and bigotry got my attention.

The article was even worse than the headline. It attempted to blame the murder of the homosexual youth in Wyoming, Matthew Shepard, on Christians when he had actually been killed by two psychopaths. They had even returned to the bar where they had found him and then attacked two straight men. They stopped only when one psychopath was hit with a stick and suffered a skull fracture.

After neither the New Bedford paper nor its owner responded to friendly, polite letters, I reluctantly investigated to discover for myself whether there was any truth to what they had said.

Like most people, this is not a topic I would willingly think about. There are so many wonderful things in the world to discover that no one would want to spend time on the unfortunate people who have tripped into this foolish behavior.

I did some research to see if the Christian community was truly attacking homosexuals. The answers to my many questions came quickly. After about a month, many things were clear.

  • No Christians were attacking homosexuals anywhere in the country, either in speech or action.

  • These unfortunate people did not have a “gay gene” that forced this homosexual behavior. It was clear that no one believed that outdated theory any more.

But the shock came when I found what we were teaching the children in all the Massachusetts schools. We were telling them that casual sex is the norm that everyone should follow and homosexual sex is just a matter of choice, like Coke or Pepsi.

In other words, the schools were encouraging the children to be sexually active in any way they wished.

It became abundantly clear a few months later that the people of our state would not support this encouragement of casual sex if they knew about it. When we did a telephone poll of 600 people across the state and asked whether teenagers should be encouraged to be sexually active, we were amazed that 92% said “No.” This poll talked to all sexes and ages. Even those who identified themselves as liberals responded with 91% saying “No.”

There were a large number of people out there waiting to be very angry when they discovered what was happening.

Most people agreed with that first article in January 1999. We had hit a “nerve.” But most were reluctant to get “involved.” They wished that the subject would just “go away” without bothering their lives. Some resented that we had awakened them to the problem.

But most were supportive. One anonymous telephone message was, “Most people don’t know what the children are being taught. Thanks for making other parents aware. Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!” But the caller never told us who she was.

It became clear that no one in the establishment was going to engage in an “Intelligent Discussion” at any level. No one in the press, in the schools, or in politics would even discuss the issue.

They went for the personal attack against me. But it was difficult for them. Here they had a respected, intelligent lawyer and leader in the legal community. It was difficult to find anything in my newspaper or in my personal life that they could attack.

The town of Newton even had an official rally against “hate mail” and me. The Mayor, the Superintendent of Schools, state Senator Creem and many other dignitaries and teachers attended but very few citizens showed up except for many homosexual activists from around the state. It was after this rally that we decided we would never be allowed to have a discussion in this state unless we started our own print newspaper, which began in June 1999.

One other event that will be forever etched in my memory is of a meeting where a teenage boy came up to me and my wife with tears in his eyes after outing himself to cheers from homosexual activists. “I don’t want to be different, I don’t want to be different,” were the words that he used. But our schools had pushed him into the hands of homosexual activists and into that lifestyle instead of helping him so that he would not feel “different.” The female principal of the high school had been unable to control the school and so when anyone taunted this boy, she would call the police! He told us this had happened twelve times! Talk about making this poor boy “different” from the rest of his peers. What a burden of guilt all of us have in this society.


How MassNews Got ‘Sidetracked’ Onto Morality
Women Who Dislike Men, Are they Lesbians?
Massachusetts Is Slowly Changing

Copyright ©2001 Massachusetts News, Inc. Photocopying and data processing storage of all or any part of this issue may not be made without prior written consent.