|

We Need an Outstanding Leader at DSS
Social Worker Should Not Be in
Charge
Terrorist
Attack Was a Warning to Women
October
2001
When
State Police troopers burst into the maternity ward of a hospital
last month to help social workers seize a day-old baby from the
arms of its mother, all of us were brutally damaged.
But
it took the Wall Street Journal to tell us so. They had a headline
on Monday, “Another Massachusetts Outrage.” They described the incident
as “chilling.”
But
no one in Massachusetts appears to be aware that anything has even
happened.
To
make it worse, the person in charge at DSS, Jeffrey Locke, was praised
and lauded at a hearing before the Governor’s Council last month
after Gov. Swift had appointed him as a judge on our Superior Court.
Now
that he is a judge, he will be ruling on important cases such as
this, affecting our fundamental liberties.
We Need an
Outsider for Commissioner
It’s
crucial that we get a law-abiding outsider to head up DSS. The new
person must not be a social worker or someone else who is a part
of the system. It should be an outsider who brings reform and integrity
to this Department.
We
do not have a General running our Defense Department. We should
not have a social worker running DSS.
It
must be someone who understands that our law holds that one of the
most important tenets of our society is that a child is raised by
his or her parents. Only when a child is abused can the state go
to a judge and seek to remove the child.
And
the state can never take a child without the prior approval of a
judge unless it is an extreme emergency.
How
could Jeffrey Locke believe this was an extreme emergency? His DSS
had plotted for months to remove the child as soon as it was born.
Why didn’t he go to a judge before seizing the child as is required
by law? Why wasn’t the mother allowed to come before a judge and
argue for her rights and that of the child?
They
didn’t do that because DSS knew that they would lose if they did.
And
they also know that the judges of Massachusetts always allow them
to break the law with impunity. So why should they bother to follow
the law?
It
may also be a factor that the mother in this case had sued Locke
and he was getting even with her.
Why
wasn’t he asked any of this by anyone at his hearing?
It
will sound trite but DSS operates as they do in Cuba or China, but
we live in a place where we have Harvard Law School, the Boston
Bar Association and all the other bastions of liberty for which
we are famous.
Does
your child have to be taken before we realize that all of us are
under attack when we have lost the rule of law?
Only
Nev Moore Challenged It
The
only person who challenged the appointment of Jeffrey Locke to be
a judge in the Superior Court was Nev Moore, President of Justice
for Families and an activist for children and parents who have been
damaged by DSS.
Moore
held the room spellbound as she calmly made her case in opposition
to Locke’s nomination as a judge in the Superior Court. He shifted
uncomfortably in his chair during her presentation. “I would not
trust him to judge a pie contest,” she said.
She
suggested that the Governor’s Council speak with other legislators,
especially with the members of the Committee on Human Services and
Elderly Affairs, who she said have expressed their surprise and
concern that Locke does not address allegations and serious concerns
about DSS that are raised in committee meetings.
She
said that legislators tell her that ever since Locke took over DSS,
the commissioner’s office became “locked up tight and incommunicado,”
and operates under a “siege mentality.”
“It’s
absolutely unforgivable because it’s a taxpayer funded agency and
he needs to remember who is writing his paycheck,” said Moore. “We’re
not talking about an organization that builds roads and bridges
as it should, we’re talking about an organization that can destroy
a family for life.”
We
Can Do Better for Our Children
We
must let Gov. Swift know that we expect someone who is highly independent
to run this agency which is so out of control.
Let’s
hope that Gov. Swift will do better by us on her appointment and
tap someone who is truly independent of the social worker clique
which dominates that agency.
We
must really think about the children this time.
|