Harry Stewart received national publicity when he was jailed for six months because he refused to sign a false confession that he was a violent person.  These pickets protested outside his jail.

Harry Stewart's Son Still Fighting for His Rights

November 2001 

Harry Stewart was convicted in Quincy District Court two years ago for a technical violation of a restraining order by a hateful wife. The violation occurred when he opened a heavy, metal outside door at an apartment house for his little boy after they returned to the boy's home from a visit. Before opening the door, he waited ten minutes in the car honking the horn for the mother to let the boy in as he struggled to enter.

Stewart waited for a long time because his wife had a long history of putting him in such positions. He finally got out of the car because the boy had to go to the bathroom.

Judge Joseph Welch, the presiding judge at Stewart's trial, told the jury that they were not to confuse the issue by looking for "abuse" because "there is no abuse in this case." The jury was instructed to return a guilty verdict if Stewart had violated the court order when he got out of his car.

Stewart was convicted and given a six-month suspended sentence on condition that he attend a batterer's program called "Common Purpose." In order to enter the program, Common Purpose wanted him to admit that he was there because he had abused his wife. He refused to sign the false confession and was jailed for six months.

Sign False Confession or 'Go to Jail'

"How can a judge send me to a batterer's program for men that abuse women if he's saying there are no abuse charges there?" Stewart said to MassNews. "I wasn't even accused of abuse."

He said that many fathers are faced with that dilemma. "Either you lie and sign a false confession and attend a batterer's program, or you are going to jail for six months for violating parole. That's coercion."

Stewart said his wife attacked him with knives and cookware and uttered death threats. He said there aren't any batterer's programs set up for women to deal with their violence. The programs are all set up for men. "That clearly demonstrates how biased the system is against men and fathers," he says.

Stewart, acting pro-se, got the restraining order against him vacated this year after he battled his former wife's free team of lawyers from the elite law firm of Foley, Hoag and Eliot. The former wife, who evidence shows was the abuser in the family, kept renewing the restraining order against him and was seeking a permanent one.

MassNews called several of the embarrassed lawyers at the time to find out why they made such a production of going after an innocent man, but they did not want to comment. They also would not answer questions about what sort of criteria they use to choose clients.

Six Years Before Hearing

"Why did it take that court six years before I finally had an evidentiary hearing?" asked Stewart.

Stewart said that is a big problem. Men are not given an evidentiary hearing where any testimony is heard. "They are given a restraining order. Ten days later, you are supposed to have a hearing. But it's not an evidentiary hearing. You stand before the judge and she stands before the judge. Most of the time it is a he-said, she-said. She says, 'I'm afraid of him.' He says, 'I haven't done anything to her.' And then BAM, he gets a restraining order."

Stewart said if there is no other evidence than someone's word, the case should be dismissed. He said people say it is only a civil law, there is nothing to worry about. "I say, if she can lie to get the restraining order, she can lie to say I violated it when she puts me in jail."

In an evidentiary hearing, said Stewart, the judge has to produce findings of fact and actually prove his decision. "What the judge does instead at the ten-day hearing is take the woman's affidavit and magically make that evidence. He calls it an evidentiary hearing but it's not one."

Cong. Bill Delahunt Caused Problem

Stewart said former District Attorney Bill Delahunt (now a Congressman), retired Judge Black and former Chief of Probation Andrew Klein were major players in setting up Norfolk County as a so-called national model for combating domestic violence.

"All three of them, Delahunt, Black and Klein were taking equal credit almost in a competitive way. They were on 60 Minutes for having such a great domestic violence program. The show was even repeated a few different times. But what 60 Minutes failed to see was something the fathers in front of the courthouse were pointing out. The state office that checks out the courthouses on a yearly basis gave the Quincy District Court an 'F' rating.

"Our point was, how can a court that got so much national attention just two or three years ago - over three hundred courts have modeled themselves after that courthouse - how could the state commission give them an 'F' rating?

"We were trying to show the public that the more Quincy District Court handed out restraining orders to law-abiding men --  they had a larger amount of orders per capita than any other courthouse --  the more successful the program was going to look because these law-abiding citizens were not going to violate them for the most part, although sometimes there are very vindictive women who try to put men in jail for technical violations.

"Quincy sent out tons of restraining orders to good men and not many of them violated them. It made Quincy courthouse look like a very successful courthouse. People would say, 'Look at all those restraining orders. Because of their great counseling programs they have in place, men are not violating them.' But it's not true. I never saw any counseling programs other than the batterer's programs that men are forced to go into.

"So, Quincy put out a lot of restraining orders on law-abiding men who didn't violate them and it made Quincy look good. That was the secret of Quincy District Court.

Fathers Who Complain are Targeted

"Because the Fatherhood Coalition revealed things like that to the public, the DA's office went after us like a rabid dog.

"Quincy was our headquarters. The head of the South Shore chapter of the Fatherhood Coalition was a psychiatric worker called John Daniels. He went to jail. The leader of the chapter after Daniels was a Weymouth School Committee member. He was thrown into a mental institution. I was the last leader of that chapter. After I went to jail, everybody was afraid to do anything with the South Shore chapter of the Fatherhood Coalition. Since me, there hasn't been any South Shore chapter."

Asked who the DA's were who persecuted the chapter heads, Stewart said, "Bill Delahunt and Jeffrey Locke [recent Commissioner of DSS and now a judge in the Superior Court]."

Stewart says Daniels had a restraining order and was supposed to call his children certain days of the week. His former wife would not let him talk to his children. She'd hang up the phone or not answer it at all at his appointed call-in times.

After two or three months the mother got an answering machine. Daniels left a message to her telling her it is not good for the children to not have both parents in their lives. "And then he said in the message, besides, you can get into real deep trouble because you are in contempt of court for not letting me talk to the children," according to Stewart.

Stewart said the former wife took the tape to her attorney and said that Daniels threatened her. "Somewhere between the attorney and the judge the tape got lost," says Stewart. He said the judge sent Daniels to a batterer's program although Daniels never had a record of abuse, the wife just told the judge she was afraid of him.

The batterer's program dismissed Daniels and wrote to the court that he was inappropriately placed and didn't belong there. But the judge said he would find a place to send him. Daniels participated fully in a program where he was placed except he wouldn't stand up and admit he was a batterer. Judge Black sent him to jail, says Stewart.

"After Daniels, Paul Corey took leadership. The man is a genius, very intelligent. On his own, he had written proposed legislation before he ran into us at the Fatherhood Coalition. He would leave food and clothing at the end of the driveway because his kids would call him and say they didn't have any food.

"While they tried to prosecute him for that, he didn't participate because he thought the whole thing was ludicrous. While he was doing this passive resistance, he was reading a book by Ghandi on non-violent resistance; they brought in a psychologist to analyze him because he wouldn't talk to anybody except his attorney.

"They sent him to be evaluated at Medfield State Mental Institution. They were trying to put drugs into him. They were trying to say he had delusions of grandeur. They said that because they didn't believe he knew people up at the statehouse and was trying to pass these bills."

According to Stewart, even Corey's public defender telephoned him and asked what she should do for Corey because he was so delusional. Stewart told her Corey is telling the truth and to just call the statehouse and check up on him. She did make some calls and found Corey was telling the truth.

Stewart says he told a doctor about the drugs the hospital was giving Corey. The doctor replied that those drugs would make him delusional. He also told Stewart they couldn't give him drugs until after they had observed him for about fifteen days. Corey had only been in there a few days.

Stewart says he brought the doctor on a visit with him, and unannounced to the institution, the doctor did several tests on Corey and determined he was highly intelligent and other than being a little depressed, which was normal under the circumstances, nothing was wrong with him.

Stewart says he and the doctor finally caught the DA unprepared, went to a judge and managed to get Corey out of there.

Copyright ©2001 Massachusetts News, Inc. Photocopying and data processing storage of all or any part of this issue may not be made without prior written consent.