|
Sidebar:
Hospitals
Monitor New Mothers for DSS

By
Ed Oliver
February 20, 2001
How
the maternity wards in Massachusetts hospitals monitor new mothers
for DSS was reported in the August 2000 edition of Massachusetts
News.
The
hospitals are used also as launching pads for the new “home visitor”
programs which are state programs disguised as private agencies.
As an example, we reported how Milford Hospital provides the names
and addresses of new mothers to a state-run, home visitor program
called “Healthy Families,” which enters information and observations
about new parents gained from visits, into a computer database
that is tied to the Department of Health. A home visitor must
tell DSS if she thinks she sees a problem.
A
former worker for Healthy Families told MassNews that her supervisor
would regularly call Milford Hospital to obtain a list of new
mothers. The hospital coordinator would also give an indication
about who on the list she thought was “high risk.”
The
Howards have become amateur sleuths since they became involved
with DSS. They have compiled an enormous amount of documentation
to support their case. Some of those documents are from Spaulding
Rehab Center, where the Howard’s little daughter Faith stayed
after she was born at Brigham and Women’s with severe health problems.
The Howards learned that Spaulding has social workers that act
as DSS liaisons.
The
Howards feel they were targeted as prospects by DSS in a similar
way by using information provided by Spaulding. They say they
may have been set up when the visiting nurse came to call. Spaulding
records note that the Howards were renovating their home, were
under stress and having a tough time coping with their daughter’s
special needs while taking care of their two sons — sitting ducks
for social workers looking for an excuse to snatch kids.
Heidi
was suffering from post partum depression according to the Howards
and her attorney.. The Howards found a notation in Spaulding’s
records on October 28, 1999 saying, “DSS home visit.” The Howards
had previously assumed the visiting nurse was sent by Spaulding
to their home, not by DSS, to help assess their needs for Faith.
On
November 1, 1999, there is a notation in Spaulding’s records saying,
“DSS placement.” This shows that DSS had already told Spaulding
they were taking the children even before any investigation by
DSS took place and just four days after the 51A complaint was
filed by the visiting nurse. This was also evident because the
father was not allowed to visit his baby girl the next day by
security guards at Spaulding without any reason being given. The
Howards say the visiting nurse, who was sent by DSS, telephoned
Heidi out-of-the-blue and told her she was on the way and would
be there in an hour and couldn’t change her schedule. The nurse
agreed to just go over paperwork. When she got to the house, she
commenced an inspection of the home without permission and did
not want to do any paperwork.
MassNews wrote in the August,
2000 edition about the vision of C. Henry Kempe, who is credited
with helping to launch the modern child abuse industry. He believed
that the government is a superior “parent,” and he envisioned compulsory
home visitation to monitor parents and evaluate new mothers. As
we showed at the time, that vision is well on its way in Massachusetts.
Main article:
Why
was mother shackled for not giving baby to strangers?
Sidebar:
Neighbors speak well of the Howard family
Related:
MARE director debates Justice for Families Pres. Nev Moore over
benefits of adoption parties
|