|
Do
We Need a 'Protection of Marriage Act' In Mass.?
In
order to encourage mothers and fathers to raise
their own children, we have always praised and
honored husbands and wives in this state. It's
the 1) cheapest and 2) the best way to raise
children that we have discovered. That concept
is now under attack by four groups.
|
Bryan
Rudnick explains to the
Judiciary Committee why many
believe it is important to
mothers and our society that
marriage be defined in the laws
of the state.
|
News
Analysis
Who
Will Raise the Children?
Today,
it’s clear that marriage must be defined if
children are going to continue to be raised
by their parents
An
act defining marriage in Massachusetts
Why
not ‘compromise’and remove Section B?
Boston
Bar President Confused About Marriage Bill
Said
act would be 'superfluous' and 'redundant'
Do
all Boston lawyers oppose ‘Protection of Marriage
Act?’
Committee
Hears Citizens’ Opinions About
Protection of Marriage Bill
Range
of voices was heard on Beacon Hill about the
Protection of Marriage Bill, both pro and con
'Protection
of Marriage' favored by Mass voters
News
Analysis
Feminists
Want ‘Protection of Marriage’
to Fail
What
they do wish to happen in Massachusetts?
News
Analysis
Vermont
Court Warned Its Citizens, It Could Be
‘Destabilizing’ Marriage
Made
clear the mothers in traditional marriages are
the ones who will be adversely affected
'Clear
and Present Danger' to Marriage in Mass. Says Constitutional
Law Professor Dwight Duncan
Constitutional
Law Professor Dwight G. Duncan warned the legislature
that marriage is threatened in Massachusetts
in the following testimony
|
