Women's
'Right to Know' Seen As Important
July
2001
The
Joint Committee on the Judiciary faces the daunting task of
making decisions on 800 bills. A dozen of these proposals
concern abortion, including three which would expand abortion
rights.
We
asked several pro-life leaders their opinion on the various
bills and what their expectations are. As diverse as the
pro-life community is, all leaders had pretty much the same
viewpoint.
Laurie
LeTourneau, President of Life Action League of Massachusetts,
told us, "The most important bill to me is the Women's
Right to Know (H3953) because it is crucial that women be
apprised of the myriad of problems associated with abortion.
Every woman should be told of the abortion and breast cancer
link, as well as what a developing fetus looks like and the fact
that the baby has a beating heart at three weeks. They should
also be given the names of hotlines for crisis pregnancy centers
for those who need financial or emotional help. All women
undergoing an ultrasound should be allowed to view the baby at
these abortion clinics."
Her
expectations are not high, LeTourneau told us. She said,
"Knowing the pitiful crew at the State House, I would
imagine they will do nothing about these bills."
Bill
Cotter of Operation Rescue, Boston, also has less than a
positive outlook on the chance for passage of the pro-life
bills. He said, "It doesn't look good because the Senate
has a 2-to-1 pro-abortion majority and the House has a majority.
The governor, of course, is in favor of abortion." Despite
his negative outlook, Cotter thinks that the most important bill
is "Informed Consent."
Gerry
D'Avolio, Executive Director of the Massachusetts Catholic
Conference, told us that he expects the committee to put a lot
of the controversial bills into study committees. He says this
is akin to putting them in the ground and erecting a gravestone.
Like the others, D'Avolio considers
H
3953 the most important bill the committee will consider this
week. He said that he has heard a lot of comment on the bill and
he knows the committee has been hearing about it, too. He said
that he's also been hearing that "the pro-abortion forces
are afraid of informed consent. But it should be an easy one to
like - it's intended to help women."
If
these bills do not receive favorable reports from the Judiciary
Committee, D'Avolio says that pro-lifers need to take part of
the blame. "We need to do more in the grassroots," he
explained, adding that specifically the Catholic Conference
needs to do more to get out and educate people.
LeTourneau
disagrees with that viewpoint. She would place the blame squarely
on the shoulders of the legislature. She said, "The Judiciary
has a moral responsibility to vote these bills out of committee
favorably and bring them to the whole legislative body. If not,
then the Attorney General should have pressure put upon him to follow
the laws and make sure every woman
has the right to know the physical and emotional pitfalls to an
abortion.
|
Copyright ©2001 Massachusetts News,
Inc. Photocopying and data processing storage of all or any part
of this issue may not be made without prior written consent.
|