|
|||
|
Copyright ©2001 Massachusetts News, Inc. Photocopying and data processing storage of all or any part of this issue may not be made without prior written consent.
|
Newton Mayor Refuses to By
Ed Oliver Pro-family
leaders confronted Newton’s Mayor last night over his recent totalitarian-sounding
remarks that were reported in the local paper, but the Mayor declined
to answer. Mayor David
Cohen was quoted in the January 18 Newton Tab saying, “Groups have arisen
in Newton that attack and interfere with the practice of human rights
in our city. We will stand up to them until their voices are heard no
more.” Both Sam
Washburn of “Newton Parents for Moderation” and Brian Camenker of the
“Parents Rights Coalition” saw the mayor’s remarks as directed at them
because of their vocal opposition to the homosexual agenda in the schools.
They wanted the mayor to tell them precisely which groups he intended
to silence. Washburn
demanded an apology from the mayor whose statement he said would have
a chilling effect on free speech. He said, “Newton Parents for Moderation
demands that the mayor identify exactly which groups he is referring
to and that he document specifically how each of these groups ‘attack
and interfere with the practice of human rights,’” and whether it was
his group that should be “heard no more.” When Washburn
concluded by asking the mayor which groups he was referring to, the
chairman interrupted, however, and said there would be no dialogue back
and forth. The mayor sat grim-faced scribbling notes. Camenker
said he was “utterly shocked” that such a
“horrid” statement could be made by anybody in a free society
about groups in a community. “Especially,” he said, looking at the crowd
of liberals surrounding him, “in a situation like this where there is
an ongoing interest in trying to intimidate people who have a different opinion.” Camenker
blasted the ongoing assault against children by the Newton schools,
which routinely host homosexual speakers and activities such as “Bi-sexual
awareness day.” Among several examples, Camenker said a mother called
him in tears after she pulled her daughter from a play that mocked Christian
beliefs in incredibly vulgar language. “We don’t
have to sit here and beg you to not do this to our children. We have
the right to raise our children the way we want to. We don’t care who
doesn’t like it. We don’t care if you don’t like it. We don’t care if
every limousine liberal in this town doesn’t like it. We have rights
too and we’re not going to be intimidated.” Outnumbered
by Liberals Word must
have leaked out about their plans, however, because dozens of liberals
showed up instead to fill the School Committee room and crowd into the
hallway. Not a single
person applauded after family rights crusaders Washburn and Camenker
talked. However, after a trio from the newly formed “human rights” group
named “P.E.A.C.E.” called for more vigilance in implementing the gay
agenda in the schools, the room erupted in thunderous applause. The gay
agenda was, of course, carefully disguised in political rhetoric such
as “respecting differences,” “tolerance,” “diversity,” and “safety,”
while “sexual orientation” was equated with race, gender and ethnicity. P.E.A.C.E.
said its goal to “monitor” the schools to “ensure respect for human
differences continues to be a priority.” The liberal group said they
would monitor “inaccurate information” that is disseminated in the schools
that “obscures” and distorts the “school system’s value of respect of
human differences.” Not
Allowed to Speak Camenker
echoed that sentiment for MassNews adding it was “un-American” and meant
to scare people. “Something needs to be done about this,” he said. One of
the few parents there in support of Washburn and Camenker was Mary Clossey.
“I think the Newton School system is totally disgusting. We have no
rights,” she told MassNews. Another
Newton resident, Maya Golom, told MassNews she came because she was
alerted that the P.E.A.C.E. group in favor of “diversity” and “tolerance’
would be there. When she
was shown the mayor’s statement about silencing groups, she said, “You
know what? I kind of agree with the mayor. I think they are destructive
groups without a constructive purpose.” Asked if she would really want to silence them, she said, “I think basically they’ve been heard. I think everybody’s aware of their dissent. They are in the minority. I think they need to make their peace. This is the way that Newton is going to have its educational system. Either support it or not support it, but to continually raise the issue and make it unpleasant, and spend so much time focusing on an issue that’s not supported by the majority of Newton residents and Newton parents is a waste of time. We don’t have that kind of time. We need to be focusing on better education.”
|
||