Mass. Libertarians Supporting Gay Marriage
December
7, 2001
Kamal Jain has responded to
the two online articles online yesterday with the
following:
A key point missing in
your article was that Libertarians DO have a
clear position on marriage: It's no one's
business but that of those involved. No
government or other party has any right to
condone or condemn.
The connection between marriage laws and
income taxation is that both give government the
power to perform social engineering. When the
government has any power, it is beyond any
person's or group's control. It is naive to think
that just because those in power agree with you
today that they always will, or that who is in
power will remain the same. The fact that some
states have instituted civil unions, gay
marriages, etc. is proof of that.
If laws are passed today that are amenable
to some and offensive to others, the tables can
turn at any time, and eventually will. Codifying
something into a constitution as opposed to a
general law only changes the rate of change --
sometimes faster and sometimes slower -- but does
not prevent
change.
Remember well the words of President George
Washington: Government is not reason, it is
not eloquence - it is force! Like fire, it is a
dangerous servant and a fearful
master.
As
to Marijuana
As to the matter of
marijuana, it should be re-legalized, as should
all drugs. That is not a sophism. When America
was conceived in Liberty, all drugs were legal.
In 1920, the 18th Amendment was passed, in hopes
that the "evils of alcohol" be routed
from our nation. Almost immediately all manner
of crime, especially violent crime, skyrocketed.
Organized crime and gang warfare as we know it
was born in those days. In 1933 the 21st
Amendment was passed, which repealed the 18th.
Alcohol prohibition was ended.
In retrospect, some people referred to
Prohibition as a "noble experiment",
but the unintended (though fully predictable)
consequences were dire. Thousands were killed and
injured. Many were poisoned by tainted liquor.
People could not readily seek treatment for
addiction because alcohol was illegal and they
might be jailed rather than helped.
The War on Drugs has ignored the
unalterable fact that prohibition does not -- can
not -- work. In fact, all laws against consensual
"crimes" ignore that fact.
Laws that attempt to
prohibit or regulate gun ownership (in utter
violation of the 2nd Amendment, by the way) will
not end gun ownership, they will put more people
in danger because they will go without protection
or will seek to purchase unsafe guns from unsafe
sources.
Laws that attempt to
prohibit prostitution will not end prostitution,
they will push it into the dark recesses of
society where anything can happen and no one can
legally do anything about it. You name the
victimless "crime", it cannot be
stopped...only made worse. That's because they
are not crimes.
I do not consider myself a religious
scholar, but I do believe that every major
religion teaches the importance of free will, and
that only God may judge people. That is why even
though most religions paint God as omnipotent,
some people still do things that are morally
wrong. Individuals must choose their path in
life, and accept the consequences of their
actions. It does not matter if you believe in God
or not -- there are those who do, and they accept
that God will judge people when the time comes.
If you look, you will find a philosophical
consistency to Libertarianism. Individuals are
self-sovereign, and are born with inalienable
rights to their lives, liberty, and property.
Consenting adults should be free to do what they
want with other consenting adults, as long as no
one else is
harmed or coerced.
Editors Comment: We agree perfectly.
The only problem is determining when someone else has been harmed
or coerced. When making that determination, we believe one
must always include children.