Where are Govs. Cellucci and Swift?
DSS Tells Child He Is Being Adopted Before Any Hearing Is Held

Nine-Year-Old Is Told He Will Never Go Home

March 2, 2001

The nine-year-old son of the woman who was shackled in Lowell court last month  (because she didn’t want her newborn baby being cared for by strangers) has been told by the DSS that he is going to be adopted and will not be going home to his parents.

This was discovered by the parents after they received access to DSS’s own records, says Atty. Greg Hession.

“It’s outrageous that these people in DSS would tell nine-year-old Christopher that he will never be seeing his parents again,” said Hession.

Atty. Hession will be joined today by the civil rights lawyer, Chester Darling, at a hearing in Lowell about the newborn girl, Jessica.

This hearing is required because DSS will not allow the mother, Heidi Howard, to breast feed her baby when she visits the child, who is in DSS custody, because the mother is taking sedatives during this emotional time in her life. The DSS is spending its time, the court’s time, the parents’ time and the necessity of their hiring lawyers even though the baby’s pediatrician sees no problem at all for the infant.

Further time will also be taken today because the DSS is trying to remove the father’s attorney, Gregory Hession, from the case. It says that because he represented both parents until it, DSS, forced the mother to obtain her own attorney, there now is a conflict of interest.

“Their obsession with these tiny details, just as though it were the Microsoft case, shows their grand strategy of always exhausting the money and patience of any parent. That is their strategy for always having their way. They don’t care about the facts. They just want to get possession of these children so they can adopt them out and obtain more federal money,” said Atty. Hession.

The Howards believe that five-year-old Ethan is being abused in his foster home. They have noticed bruises, missing teeth, chipped teeth, crushed fingernails on both hands and a broken arm. They later discovered in DSS files that daycare workers also noticed that there were marks on the boy’s buttocks and back covered with make-up. A 51A notice of abuse was not filed against the foster mother, but the call from the daycare center was logged into DSS records. Fresh marks were again discovered later. Neil [Howard] says this is around the time his son was telling people that “Charlie” was hurting him.

A 72-hour hearing will be held concerning the newborn, Jessica, on March 14. It is called a 72-hour hearing because it is supposed to be held within 72 hours after any child is taken from a parent. The Howards have not yet received a hearing on any of their three children even though their two oldest were seized over a year ago. This is the normal procedure in Massachusetts where the judges permit DSS to show total contempt for the state’s 72-hour requirement.

Although the state spends millions of dollars on lawyers for the poor through a system controlled by the Supreme Judicial Court, neither Chester Darling nor Gregory Hession will receive any money from them for helping this poor family because that money is given only to feminist causes, and helping two parents keep their family intact is not one of those causes.

Related:
  Mother and father shackled in Lowell for not handing over infant
  Where is Chief Justice Marshall? The worst DSS story we've heard yet
  MARE director debates Justice for Families Pres. Nev Moore over benefits of adoption parties
 

 

Copyright ©2001 Massachusetts News, Inc. Photocopying and data processing storage of all or any part of this issue may not be made without prior written consent.