Helping Poor Students Draws Opposition from Globe

By Paul Moreno
April 2001

A column in the Globe complains that the MCAS test is unfair to children in poorer districts because those students do not perform as well on the tests as they do in Wellesley or private schools.

But that's exactly the point. The poor will continue to receive a second-rate education if we do not push the schools to do better, through MCAS and charter schools.

The think tank in Cambridge that opposes the MCAS, "Fair Test," does so because it believes that if it is able to dismantle this type of education reform, we will be taking the first step toward the end of capitalism.

Someone asked its president, Monty Neill, last May, "Do you think...we cannot stop the testing and make real progress toward good education for all without stopping capitalism?"

Neill replied that it was unlikely that they could stop testing while capitalism remained. He made the following reply: "It may well be possible to stop high stakes testing and corporate-led reform, though the fact that the same corporate forces are imposing education reforms around the U.S. and around the world suggests that they have a lot at stake. ... And there are limits on the depth of the transformations of the schools we can achieve while the corporations are the dominant force in society. The elite have a fundamental stake in maintaining social inequality, and the educational policies and practices we would most want to change are designed to justify social inequality by giving it an aura of 'meritocracy.'"

This has been the standard refrain of "progressive" education for the last century. It is their attempt to cover up the fact that they are the "corporate power" in education and they are the ones who contribute to social inequality, by making sure that the poorest citizens receive only the worst, standardless product of the public education monopoly.

Over half a century ago their arguments that efforts to raise academic standards and improve schools were really attempts to destroy public education by antidemocratic, non-egalitarian reactionary elitists were answered by educator Arthur Bestor. He explained that low academic standards were the gravest threat to democracy and equality that one could imagine and that liberals should be the first to condemn them.

"The way to perpetuate an aristocracy is to give sound intellectual training to a minority and offer people generally a cheap and shoddy substitute," he said.

And it was the educational establishment - which Bestor famously called "the interlocking directorate of professional educationists" composed of teacher colleges, school administrators, and state education officials and which former Education Secretary William Bennett calls "the blob" - that created and maintained mediocrity in public education.

Neill's comment was made on the list serve of the Assessment Reform Network, according to The National Association of Scholars. The column in the Globe was by Eileen McNamara.

Copyright ©2001 Massachusetts News, Inc. Photocopying and data processing storage of all or any part of this issue may not be made without prior written consent.