![]()
DECEMBER 2000 PRINT EDITION
|
Related stories: Students Taught Graphic 'Gay' Sex Judge Forbids Debate by State Senate Globe Misleads About Sex Scandal Globe Attacks Parents On Sex Scandal Formerly 'Gay' Husband and Wife Slammed by Homosexual Activist Lesbian Senator Glorified for Fighting Parents
|
Veteran
Teacher Traumatized at Fistgate December 2000 This
veteran teacher says that if parents believe that keeping their children out of
sex-ed classes will prevent the children from hearing and believing the agenda
that permeates our schools, they are wrong. It
might make the parent feel good and give a false sense of security that all is
okay under his roof. But what about GLSEN's "Integrated Curriculum
Plan?" How does a parent remove his child from math, science, English,
social studies, and foreign languages when teachers have been taught to plant
little contaminated seeds into the fertilized ground of the usual daily lessons?
This
teacher's name will not be used for obvious reasons. The
most traumatic experience of my many years in teaching was attending what is now
known as the Fistgate Conference at
Tufts University last March 25. I
was not prepared for the overwhelming distress that my body, mind and spirit
would suffer. I began by visiting an exhibit booth where a cheerful girl, about
15-years-of-age, generously supplied me with sequin-decorated packets of
condoms, which held other paraphernalia including a Band-Aid. (Another
eyewitness would later tell me that the girl explained to him that the Band-Aid
was in case the sex "got a little rough.") Despite
their "safe sex" public relations campaign, the people who sponsored
the event, Gay Lesbian Straight Educators Network, obviously teach minors that
sadomasochistic practices are normal. I thought we have laws on the books to
prevent such abuse to children, but the governor, courts, and legislature have
collectively buried their heads in the sand. It is up to individuals to expose
this horrific and overwhelming evidence of massive criminal sexual exploitation
of our children. The exhibits were only my first encounters. Suddenly the burden
of reporting the evils of this event weighed heavily on my soul.
Another
handout shocked me, not for prurient reasons, but for its painful honesty. The
small flier had a phone number for lesbians to call when they have been
physically harmed by a partner. Statistics from the gay community bear out the
ugly truth that homosexuals are far more abused or accidentally murdered by one
of their partners than they ever are by heterosexuals. S & M lives, but its
victims do not. There
is nothing "gay" about these damaging violent relationships. Violent
relationships. Yet not one of the sixty workshops addressed this serious hidden
problem where youths are bound to be its prey. So much for "safe sex."
I doubt that Ted Kennedy's hate crimes bill covers these crimes.
Massachusetts
is Model for National GSAs The
keynote speaker was the Founder of GLSEN and GSAs, Kevin Jennings. A sort of
heroic guru, he was revered and wildly applauded by young and old alike.
Jennings boasted of co-creating in 1988 the country's first two GSAs -
both in Massachusetts. In little more than a decade, GSAs now total 700, having
doubled their numbers in the last two years. "Students liberated themselves
from the closet," Jennings trumpeted.
Thanks
to the well-funded coffers of the Governor's Gay and Lesbian Youth Commission,
188 GSAs thrive in this state alone. (That means that one in four GSAs across
the country are organized in Massachusetts.) However, Jennings expressed sadness
that almost half of the Commonwealth high schools still have no such club. This
indicated to him how much work still must be done. Make
no bones about it; the Commonwealth - with your tax money - is their youth model
for the rest of the nation. Our adversaries have set their goal in concrete: a
GSA in every high school. According to several published articles I have read,
they now have begun to push them into the middle schools.
"There
is [sic] no two sides to this debate. There is a right; there is a wrong. We are
right our opponents are wrong," Jennings exulted to his cheering fans. I
longed for the good old days - maybe fifteen years ago - when the G & L
community said all they were asking for was "tolerance." But there is
no tolerance for the Judeo-Christian point of view now that the Governor's Gay
and Lesbian Youth Commission dictates its ideology to the mind-controlled
masses. They have the nerve to call this "education?" GLSEN
High Priest Twists Scripture How
many of these brainwashed teens would return to their families with new
"spiritual arguments" to challenge their parents' old-fashioned, moral
absolute beliefs of right and wrong? GLSEN's tactics, like those of postmodern
liberalism, are simple: 1) mock, tear down and remove the foundational
Judeo-Christian morality and the beliefs on which American religious culture was
built; and 2) replace the spiritual void with a new "enlightened"
religious substitute, masking what is the strategically planned opposing
worldview of secular humanism. (See
Humanist Manifesto I and II.) I
was shocked to hear the "Reverend" Jennings retell the Gospel's story
of the widow's mite. The poor widow was blessed by Jesus because she placed all
that she had in the temple offering. Jenning's misinterpretation came in the
final point as he challenged the audience to political activism: "Are we
giving all that we have [to the G & L movement]? Probably most of us could
do more." Jennings' congregation listened intently. Several workshop
presenters later echoed his do-more-for-the-cause exhortation. Not
one listener even raised an eyebrow to question High Priest Jennings' twisted
scripture. I recorded his religious rhetoric, only the first of many such
references I would encounter during the conference. It appears that GLSEN
advocates, who were spouting pagan or secular dogma a decade ago, have now
adopted more culturally acceptable religious overtones. I wondered if even the
youth brought up in the church would be able to discern the difference between
GLSEN's designer-deity garbage from the sweet fruits of God's absolute truth. Jennings'
Vision at Press Conference in 1993 Referring
to the foreseeable religious objections by parents and teachers of faith,
Jennings added in 1993, "All they are doing is claiming personal objections
or religious beliefs as an excuse....I would like to take a moment here to
address the complaint by religious groups who feel that our program violates
their religious beliefs and therefore is inappropriate. In case people have
forgotten, I'd like to remind us all that there is separation of church and
state in this country, and that religious beliefs cannot...dictate state
policy." The audience wildly applauded their approval. My
memory of the unique location of this 1993 press conference serves me well.
Following Jennings' speech to much fanfare, Governor William Weld entered the
sanctuary and spoke from the pulpit of the Arlington Street Unitarian
Universalist Church on Boston Common. Kevin Jennings and his entourage in the
Governor's Gay and Lesbian Youth Commission are blind to their own hypocrisy.
They selectively omit any church-state separation arguments when the most
extreme left-wing religious organizations and tenets can serve their purposes. Not
All Teens Express "Gay-ity" Many
of the youths, who were bussed in from dozens of local high schools, were
outwardly jubilant. Some greeted each other with same-sex hugs and
mouth-to-mouth friendly kisses as they recognized familiar faces in a crowded
cafˇ. The gay and lesbian adult community has provided these kids with a sense
of belonging and acceptance, a sense of purpose for their rebellious
"whatever" lifestyles. Like all teens, these children - tossed in the
insecure throes of adolescence - long for meaningful relationships, caring for
others and being cared for in return. Not
all the youths expressed "gay-ity." One frail, round-shouldered young
man caught my eye. Dressed
androgynously with a girl's triangular kerchief tied around his head, he played
with skimpy portions of rice and vegetables, then finally pushed the tray away.
His eyes and cheeks were hollow, and he looked the classic case of anorexia.
"He's starving for much more than food," I thought. His image further depresses me.
The
handsome young man with delicate features stared from one end of the table
observing the animated banterings of the other guys who wolfed down their
mounded plates. He was the picture of loneliness lost in a crowd, trying to fit
in somewhere. His heart hungered to belong and his soul was running on empty.
His tightly-closed negative body language hid a silent story of pain and
rejection. His emotional level
registered numb. Throughout the entire lunchtime, not one of the peers
acknowledged his presence. His
portrait is framed in my mind. I've
titled it "hopeless." Grand
Finale: Student Monologues After
six hours of mentally absorbing the propaganda of a lifestyle contrary and
perverse to nature, my mind was shutting down. I vaguely remember introductory
remarks by the gay playwright who coached the performers. A quartet of two boys
and two girls took turns dramatizing their scripts without the least hint of
inhibition. I remembered thinking, "These kids are really talented. If only
someone would guide them with a moral compass to channel their energy into
wholesome outlets. If only ..." Their
fast-paced deliveries were frequently interrupted by boisterous hoots and howls
from an enthusiastic audience of mostly teens. (Educators did not receive
DOE-approved re-certification credits for the finale, so most of them had left.)
Yet, in the shadows I saw somebody's mother or perhaps a curious teacher
reacting with negative body language when the more shocking passages pierced her
ears. She was not happy, but would she dare register her complaints with those
in power? Fat chance. I just was not "getting" much of the humor or points that the teen quartet took turns sharing with full abandon. But the audience responded uproariously to sexual innuendo that zapped over my head. The youthful actors were connecting with peers because both had experienced or eroticized similar sexually promiscuous encounters in their short lives. Two
parts stand out in my memory. One girl spoke in triple-X terms of her lesbian
affair with an older woman on the desert sands. She entitled it, "Lizard
Woman." I wondered why no one ever told this minor that she had been
statutorily raped, even if her liaison was consensual.
Another
young man interrupted his monologue to play an original composition on the
piano. I relaxed, thinking how gifted and un-sexualized this kid was.
Suddenly, he stood up from the bench, and - still playing - simulated
masturbation with the edge of the keyboard. The audience responded raucously.
Despite all I had experienced in the last six hours, I was still shocked by this
raunchy, socially unacceptable behavior. Apparently, this composition was his
interpretation of self-stimulation. "Has this young man already joined the
ranks of those who are addicted to cybersex?" I feared.
Since
I have never attended a show for "Adults Only," I guessed that this
finale was a good example of one. But these are kids! Where are the police to
protect them from such a criminal exploitation? If this auditorium at Tufts had
been zoned for adult entertainment in any Massachusetts town, GLSEN would have
had to apply for alicense. The sensibilities of common citizens would not allow
such establishments anywhere near children.
But
here our tax dollars are supporting profanity, obscenity, and lewd and
lascivious conduct "by minors" and "for minors!" Governor
Cellucci, the state Board of Education, and the DOE have not even called for a
full investigation of Fistgate. Based on the accumulating evidence, they should
be booked for conspiring in crimes against children. Being part of the
educational system, are they not all "mandatory reporters" wherever
child abuse is suspected? Where is the DSS when you need them to uncover bona
fide sex crimes en masse against children?
A
man with a video camera recorded the whole show. I wondered if these kids would
end up on a porno flick. Someone once told me that since these obscenities
occurred in an educational setting, there is a Massachusetts law that protects
garbage as "free speech." Then
why do we not change such a ridiculous law? If I showed young people that
videotape of Fistgate in my home, I would be arrested! Lost
Children of GLSEN As
in the days of Esther, a few of us are called for "such a time as
this." Some must be the
risk-takers and emissaries of truth in order to deliver God's innocent children
from impending annihilation. "My
only agenda," I anonymously told the principal in Acushnet last summer,
"is to save children from all harm and danger." (See Acushnet school
stories in July and August issues of Massachusetts News.) He agreed with me.
That was his agenda, too. (Principal
John Tavares's courageous decision to eliminate the homosexual component from
the students' anti-prejudice projects of the Holocaust curriculum bears this
out.) More
than a week after Fistgate, I still could not get a restful night's sleep. Like
a recurring nightmare that torments one's soul, I was haunted by the trusting
faces of these bewildered kids - the Lost Children of GLSEN - cycloning in my
head. I
was gazing into the future faces of death, for surely some of these GLSEN-ized
teens will not live to see 30. The unhealthy homosexual practices (for which
Fistgate was named) will spread personal tragedy to them and their families and
then spiral down further to destroy society. Disease and emotional pain and
suffering will eventually enslave their bodies and souls, eradicating any trace
of "gay-ity" that comforts them now in the gay and lesbian initiation
rituals. We will learn the tragic follies from Fistgate Fallout as the years
unfold. Our
children have been fed a deadly lie, with dollars deceptively drawn from our own
pockets. This conference offered no more than unbridled sexual license pandered
by a death-seducing skeleton in place of what young people are actually desiring
- loving relationships that last for a lifetime.
But
the real devastation is yet to come. Hundreds of unsuspecting kids who have
never heard of this conference will fall into the GLSEN trap every day of the
school year. Remember Kevin Jennings' keynote sermon? With missionary zeal, he
inspired teachers and students to carry the Holy Grail or the GLSEN Crusade into
every pocket of society. Simply
keeping your own children out of these workshops and sex-ed classes in health
will not prevent them from hearing and believing the lies that already permeate
every institution in our culture. Signing a permission slip to remove your child
from a questionable assembly program might make you feel good and give you a
false sense of security that all is okay under your roof.
But
what about GLSEN's "Integrated Curriculum Plan?" How does a concerned,
knowledgeable parent remove his child from math, science, English, social
studies, and foreign languages when teachers have been taught to plant little
contaminated seeds into the fertilized ground of the usual daily lessons? These
bad seeds will metastasize later into a full-scale sexual scourge that destroys
the most vulnerable minds and bodies of our kids. I
do not know how my beloved teaching profession has sunk to such a gutter of
depravity in only 12 years since the first GSA was organized. I only know that
enough good people have done nothing to stop the lies and deceptions from
spreading from town to town when this plague was nothing more than a sneeze. GLSEN's
scourge will only cease from demolishing more children when enough good people
declare war and expose the enemies for the liars they really are. The
days ahead will not be easy. Rest assured, any citizen who counters the status
quo by running for public office, any parent who dares to defy the ideological
lies integrated in the school curriculum will be castigated and subjected to
other incivilities. Get used to it. You have plenty of company, and the ranks
are growing every day. Your kids are worth it. Take
heart. Remember that our children do not belong to GLSEN, the Department of
Education, the National Education Association, the U.S. Government, the United
Nations or the devil himself. They legally and biblically still belong to you -
the parents. And there are a lot more of us than there are of them. |