Court Dismisses
Defendants from Fistgate Suit
Women's Bar Becoming a Lesbian
Organization?
Who Needs A Women's Bar?
Judge Advocates Gay Marriage
ACLU Refuses to Help Molested
Children
What Does Juliet Want?
Mass Bar to Rate Judges
$1.9 Million from
Feds Against Dorchester Men
Globe's 'New Look' Means More
$$$$
What's the Worst HMO?
John Hancock Isn't
Talking About Gay Ad
Excellent Globe Column
by Eileen McNamara
Excellent Globe Column by
Brian Mooney
Elian Is Sighted
Will WGBH Cover This?
Woman Charged
for Protecting Herself With Gun
Pro-Lifers Protest
at Bishop Reilly's Anniversary
Only in Newton
Court
Dismisses Defendants from Fistgate Suit
The suit against the parents who taped the Fistgate scandal sought
to include anyone who had a copy of the tape or a transcript of what happened
there. But even Judge Allan van Gestel would not go that far with his gag
order. The homosexual activists wanted to forbid anyone from discussing
anything that took place at Fistgate. Therefore, they listed 1000 "unknown
John Does" as defendants. But those 1000 Does were all dismissed from the
suit last month by the court. This means that only the two parents, Scott
Whiteman and Brian Camenker, and the Parents Rights Coalition of Massachusetts
are still listed as defendants.
Women's Bar Becoming
a Lesbian Organization?
The lesbian lawyer who brought a suit against the parents who exposed
the Fistgate scandal is going to receive an award from the Women's Bar
Association at its Eleventh Annual Gala this month. The recipient is Mary
Bonauto of the Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. She has sued
Brian Camenker and Scott Whiteman and cajoled Judge Allan van Gestel into
granting an unconstitutional gag order against the parents. One must wonder
if Judge van Gestel will be so foolish as to appear at the event.
The Women's Bar is fast becoming like NOW, which dumped Betty Friedan
very early because she fought the decision to make it a lesbian organization.
Who Needs A Women's Bar?
Women control all of the courts in the state except for the District
Court and they have the majority on the SJC, which is fine if they are
all competent. So why do they still need a organization which discriminates
against men? What more do they want? No judge should appear at a partisan
event such as this, but many of them will be there. It will be held on
October 5 at the Marriott Copley.
Judge Advocates Gay Marriage
Despite the ironclad rule that no judge should ever try to influence
politics, this doesn't bother The Chief Justice of the Superior Court,
Suzanne DelVecchio. This judge thinks she is allowed to satisfy any whim
she has at any particular moment. What a disaster she is for those women
who are trying to be perceived as serious, intelligent people now that
they have been given positions of power.
No judge should ever attend any partisan organization. But DelVecchio
not only attended the Massachusetts Lesbian & Gay Bar Association a
few months ago, she said the following: "Vermont recognizes same-sex couples.
And here we are in Massachusetts. Would you please? It's embarrassing.
Could we get with the program a little bit? ... The only way gays and lesbians
in this state are going to achieve what has been achieved in Vermont is
to say who you are, apply for the [important] jobs and demand to be seated
at the table ... Nothing is easy. Do you think getting my hair this color
is easy?"
ACLU Refuses to Help
Molested Children
It's revealed in this issue by Nat Hentoff that the ACLU refused to
help the parents who taped the Fistgate scandal when they were sued by
the homosexual activists and Judge van Gestel issued a gag order. But the
ACLU has been quick to jump into the Curley case, against the family, where
the family is suing the North American Man/Boy Association for the murder
of their child. While the ACLU can mount a intellectual argument for their
decision to fight the Curleys, it certainly does show where their priorities
are and what they think is important.
What Does Juliet Want?
A Globe reporter wrote a news story last month with the headline, "Bickering
risks expiration of antiviolence act." Do you think that reporter, Juliet
Eilperin, wants the Violence Against Women Act to expire? This article
was not on the editorial page; it was in the news section. Juliet just
assumes that if she wants the law to continue, doesn't everyone? Needless
to say, there was nothing in her story about the U.S. Supreme Court holding
that the law was unconstitutional in that it was a severe case of the federal
government meddling in the affairs of local governments.
Mass Bar to Rate Judges
There is good news from the Massachusetts Bar Association - we hope.
It is going to rate the judges in the state. This is a very difficult thing
to do in a fair manner. It is only after a few years that we will be able
to determine whether the system is working, but it's obviously a good step.
It's too bad that they won't release the results from the first year. The
president, Edward Ryan, will be gone by the second year and the enthusiasm
may leave with him. There is no question that every lawyer in the state
is hesitant to comment about a judge because the lawyers have to
live with these judges for many years. But if they can rate them anonymously,
it might prove valuable.
$1.9 Million
from Feds Against Dorchester Men
The federal government is intruding into Boston with a $1.9 million
pilot project to establish a domestic violence court in Dorchester. From
what we see, this will mean more experts (including the judges who are
assigned there) who will agree that all men are terrible people and all
women are victims. When any judge is put into such a specialized court,
he or she always suffers burnout from boredom They will not be independent.
They will be former social workers who are already a part of the system.
It's just more proof of the power that the professional feminists have
in our society.
Globe's 'New Look' Means
More $$$$
The Globe says they've changed their paper to help the readers. But
that's so much baloney. The new look will make more dollars for its owner,
the New York Times. The size of the paper has been shrunk so that they
can save on paper costs while still charging an advertiser the same price
for a page of advertising. That means more profits. While doing that, they
have to shrink the size of the type that you read. They're trying to compensate
for the difficulty in reading by making the print somewhat bolder.
You'll notice that Fidelity Investments is doing the same thing for
its 134 newspapers in the Boston area, including the Tab, which got a new
look earlier this year. If you compare Fidelity to the Globe, you will
see that they are now identical in size. This makes it easier for all of
them to go after the big advertisers who need to prepare only one size
ad for all the papers in the state. This will make it more difficult for
the few remaining independent dailies who cannot buy new presses like the
billionaires at Fidelity and the Times. They'd be happy to put all of us
small newspapers out of business.
The announcement at the Globe was: "To our readers. Today, the Globe
has a new look, new features, and improved navigational tools to help you
make your way through the pages."
What's the Worst HMO?
If you think your HMO is bad, how would you like the people on Beacon
Hill to be your next HMO? A good place to compare is with Canada where
their legislature just approved $15.8 billion additional because, according
to a Globe story, "Long waiting lists, over-crowded hospitals and old equipment
have tarnished the reputation" of their health care system. Do you wonder
if the $15.8 billion will be enough? Would you like Beacon Hill to be making
those decisions for you?
John Hancock Isn't
Talking About Gay Ad
John Hancock won't talk to the Boston Globe about a "groundbreaking"
television ad that it did for the Olympics. The paper said that a "toned-down"
ad appeared which it says is an "apparent depiction of a gay couple who
have just adopted a baby."
Excellent Globe Column
by Eileen McNamara
Despite all of the trash that the Globe has printed about Judge Lopez,
Eileen McNamara had an excellent article. (We hope she doesn't suffer the
fate of Jeff Jacoby because of it.) She says, "[C]ould we call a halt to
the whisper campaign against Charles Horton's victim?...If the Judicial
Conduct Commission finds that Superior Court Judge Maria Lopez has, on
her own or though surrogates, sought to defame this child, it is more than
just cause for removal."
But the editors at the Globe didn't listen. They were already sending
a reporter out to the boy's house to find out if he was a predator who
had tricked Charles Horton into kidnapping him. They admit they tried to
interview the boy himself. If this were a girl who was attacked, would
they do that? Why don't boys get the same protection? Even if the boy went
voluntarily with Horton, does the Globe really believe that an 11-year-old
could be responsible? And if he were, what could that possibly have to
do with the actions of Judge Lopez? Don't forget that the judge is used
to this kind of smut; she is married to the owner of the Boston Phoenix.
Excellent Globe Column
by Brian Mooney
Brian Mooney also had an excellent column the same day as McNamara.
He reported that we are one of only three states without a reappointment
mechanism for our judges. In order to remove one of our judges, we must
prove that a judge has done something wrong or else they stay for life.
Mooney lists the various mechanisms that the other 47 states use to make
sure that judges are accountable, including election for a fixed term or
removal by a yes-or-no referendum after they have served for a time. He
asks, "Do we really want the Legislature to be responsible for disciplining
our judges? Of course not. On a good day - and there aren't enough - the
state Legislature is a mediocre branch. On a bad day - and there are too
many - it's a joke."
He's right. We should not remain as one of three states which are captive
to our judges.
(The worst column in the Globe on Lopez was by Joan Vennochi which had
the title, "Judge Lopez isn't granted same leeway as men on style, temperament.")
Elian Is Sighted
Elian was sighted again last month when he went to school at his home
in Cardenas, although no impartial observor has been allowed to talk to
him since he was snatched out of Miami. Even the Associated Press reported
that he had "reportedly" been living during the summer at a "Havana boarding
school." No sightings yet of the new Archer Daniels Midland refinery in
Cuba.
Will WGBH Cover This?
Although Channel 2 has regaled us with a show telling how wonderful
man/boy sex is and how the show was acclaimed in England, the headlines
tell a different story. The headlines in the Globe are that the citizens
in England are so outraged about man/boy sex that they are having vigilantes
roaming the streets and even attacking innocent people. One must assume
that the WGBH show was not widely acclaimed at all.
Woman Charged
for Protecting Herself With Gun
The woman who protected herself in North Adams on the Mohawk Trail
last spring, by putting her holster which contained a gun on the steering
wheel of her car after an 18-wheeler tried to force her off the road, will
be going to trial on November 13. The charge is Assault with a Dangerous
Weapon. Although Linda Hamilton immediately telephoned the state police,
they charged her and not the trucker, even though she has a permit to carry
the weapon. More information is available at www.billstclair.com/LindaHamilton/petition-000901.html.
Pro-Lifers Protest
at Bishop Reilly's Anniversary
About 70 pro-life persons protested the presence of Sen. Kennedy at
the 25th Anniversary Mass of Bishop Reilly at St. Paul's Cathedral in Worcester.
William Cotter of Operation Rescue, organizer of the event, said: "To suggest
that a politician is not benefited, especially during an election year,
by a public invitation to attend an appearance with a prince of the Church
is very na•ve. Kennedy was awarded the "Champion of Choice Award" this
year by the largest pro-abortion organization in the country, NARAL. When
Cardinal Law addressed the gathering, he made some remarks in defense of
the unborn, which were interrupted several times by enthusiastic applause.
Only in Newton
There was a 10-foot banner announcing "BiSexual Awareness Day" across
Main Street at Newton North High School last month. One student commented,
"As we all know, we must protect the tender minds and hearts of our high
school students by refraining from any celebratory acknowledgment of holidays
like Hanukkah or Christmas. But do not despair: their need for celebration
is not being neglected. Tomorrow is BiSexual Awareness Day!"
Needless to say, in Newton the name of that student cannot be revealed
or he would be charged with a Hate Crime.
|