|
Freedom Will Conquer Racism
Click
Here |
#3 in a series
TV Star of Wellesley College Feminists Was Encouraged to Leave
the Airwaves Back in 2000
| Editor's Note: We
could write many "interesting" books about the
disgraceful conduct of Wellesley College. We have over 100,000
more readers now than in 2000 when Atty. Pawlick was starting
MassNews. But we already have written many articles on this
and those are found in our archives.
If a reader wants to get the true flavor of Wellesley College,
they should read the article
that Rolling Stone wrote about the school in 2001 when
the magazine editors were shocked at the rampant lesbian
parties there. |
The television star of the radical Wellesley
feminists was Dr. William Pollack.
He was a psychologist from Harvard
Medical School,
who stepped forward with feminist theory to explain the Columbine
massacre when it jolted everyone on April
20, 1999.
He’d just written a book which said: “Boys
today are in serious trouble, including many who seem ‘normal’
and to be doing just fine.”
That
was an indictment of every boy in America.
The title of the book was: “Real Boys, Rescuing Our Sons from
the Myths of Boyhood.” |
Newsweek magazine was still prominently displaying that
feminine message from Wellesley College on its cover earlier this
year with a picture of a group of “regular” boys who were all
said to be in trouble. Its issue of Feb. 13, 2006 on the learning problems
of boys “drew more than 200 letters from parents, educators, young people,“according to Newsweek.
Back in 1999, Dr. Pollack was the respected expert
“from Harvard” that every television show wanted. He frightened
and calmed the country at the same time (while also making lots of money).He was a national phenomenon, running
from the “Today” show to “Oprah” to lectures around the country
where he was treated like a hero, while he autographed many thousand
more copies of his best-selling book. |
NewsWeek Magazine is Still Attempting to
Tell the Wellesley College Lies in 2006 that Boys are "In
Crisis" |
At his peak in the fall of 2000,
Dr. Pollack had his lawyer flamboyantly threaten our founder,
Atty. J. Edward Pawlick, with a lawsuit because of a story about
Dr. Pollack in MassNews. But Pawlick immediately welcomed the
suit because it would allow him to question Dr. Pollack. The many
unanswered questions about Pollack's research would be answered.
As Pawlick expected, the lawyer never responded.
But, by the following July, Atty. Pawlick had discovered
the answers he had been seeking, without any help from Dr. Pollack.
In his book, Dr. Pollack gave great credit to the radical
feminists at the Stone
Center at Wellesley
College. He agreed
with the Wellesley
feminists that their joint goal must be to start with boys who
are still malleable and make them act more like girls. |
Research
of Famous Harvard Psychologist Seriously Flawed, Perhaps Fraudulent
Students
at Belmont Hill School Thought It Was a 'Farce'
By Atty. J. Edward Pawlick
July 2001
The
research that made Harvard psychologist William Pollack a famous
expert on American boys and frightened American parents and educators
is seriously flawed, if not fraudulent, according to people familiar
with the study. |
Pollack Threatened to Sue MassNews |
Pollack's
anti-male conclusions were used by Harvard
Medical
School
in 1998 to declare a "national emergency" that called
for "major social reform" of boys.
The boys at Belmont
Hill
School
who were used by Dr. William Pollack to conduct the research for
his best-selling book about American boys thought that the survey,
which reportedly employed coercion, was a farce.
"No
one around me took the exam seriously with such one-sided and
leading questions being asked," one former pupil says. "The
test turned into a complete farce when kids began shouting out
their answers to their classmates in an effort to make a joke." |
One
student still vividly remembers one question that they were required
to answer. "I was asked to answer how often I thought about
killing myself --- not if I did --- how much I did. I was given the choice
between once a year, once a month, once
a week, or once a day." One parent says the school refused
to provide parents with copies of the "test" which was
administered to their sons.
"We were absolutely
shocked when the teachers threateningly demanded that we sign
our names. I feel I can honestly say that the common sentiment,
as a direct result of those one-sided questions, throughout the
entire class was to not take the test seriously," a student
has told Massachusetts News.
It is a violation of
the Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association,
to force subjects to complete surveys and to sign their names.
Against universally
accepted scientific practice, Pollack has always refused to reveal
where the research was conducted or to allow other academics to
examine the data behind the sweeping and alarming conclusions
he published in Real Boys. But concerned parents and former pupils
have revealed that Pollack's research was done on May
19, 1997,
at the prestigious Belmont Hill School just outside Boston.
The boys continued to
talk about it for days. "Over the course of the next few
days," a boy says, "it became a badge of honor to admit
that one had filled it out incorrectly simply to spite this test
which, no matter how accurately answered, in no way reflected
the student. As a result, the student body did not answer accurately
and honestly. I am still outraged and frightened that the answers
I wrote on that test are actually connected to me by name, or
by any means."
Because of fear of retaliation,
until the students left Belmont Hill and had been accepted at
colleges, the revelations have until now been kept from the public.
In addition, the boys do not wish to damage the school in any
way.
In the meantime, Pollack
a clinical psychologist at Harvard Medical School, became famous and rich because of
his best-selling book, published in 1998.
Harvard Called it a "National
Emergency"
Pollack's research came
under attack last year in a book by Prof. Christina Hoff Sommers,
of the American Enterprise Institute. In "The War Against
Boys" she wrote that we are turning against boys as the result
of research that is "riddled with errors."
"On June 4, 1998,"
she wrote, "McLean Hospital, the psychiatric teaching hospital
of the Harvard Medical School, issued a two-page Press Release
announcing the results of a new study of boys. The Release ...
reported that researchers at McLean and Harvard Medical School found that 'psychologically "healthy"
middle-class boys' are anxious, alienated, lonely and isolated - 'despite appearing outwardly content.'"
Sommers noted that Harvard
said that this was a "national emergency" that had been
discovered by Dr. Pollack that called for "major social reform."
She reported that Harvard said, "The time has come to change
the way boys are raised - in our homes, in our schools and in
society."
It's unusual to find
such sensational claims and recommendations issuing from a staid
research institution such as McLean, which is routinely ranked among
the top three psychiatric hospitals in the United States, Sommers reported.
So Professor Sommers
asked to see the research. "I requested a copy of the 'Listening
to Boys' Voices' study from McLean. A few days later, a thirty-page
typed manuscript arrived. It had not been published, nor was it
marked as about to be published. It had none of the usual properties
of a professional research paper. Unlike most scientific papers,
which alert readers to their limits, Pollack's paper was unabashedly
extravagant, declaring that 'these findings about boys are unprecedented
in the literature of research psychology.'"
The "national emergency,"
Sommers discovered, was based on a "battery of vaguely described
tests administered to 150 boys" in grades 7-9. She says Pollack
gave no explanation of how the boys had been selected or whether
they constituted anything like a representative sample.
"In sum,"
Sommers reported, "Pollack's paper does not present a single
persuasive piece of evidence for a national boy crisis. I do not
know whether 'Listening to Boys' Voices' has been submitted for
publication in a professional journal. Its sparse data and its
strident and implausible conclusions render it un-publishable
as a scholarly article."
When Pollack's former
subjects now realize how their answers have been used by Dr. Pollack
as a recipe for changing the boys all across America, they are astonished.
"Our immature attempt
at humor four years ago should not be the benchmark for the 21st
century," one told the Massachusetts News.
Pollack threatened to
sue Massachusetts News (but never did) after it printed a story
in the November 2000 issue. A subsequent story was published in
January 2001 with the headline, "Harvard Professor Joins
Feminist Plan to Alter the Nature of Males." The subhead
was, "Dr. William Pollack Became Famous and Wealthy, Saying
Single Mothers are Fine and Boys Are In
Crisis, Just Like Their Fathers."
Violated APA Ethical Standards
Dr. Pollack will undoubtedly respond
to these revelations by saying that he had permission from the
parents to force the boys to complete the surveys and to sign
their names. But this newspaper has learned that the only "permission"
came as the result of a long, rambling letter about various topics
from Headmaster Richard Melvoin the previous October.
Melvoin
wrote on page two of the letter, "Belmont Hill has been asked
to participate in two surveys. One will survey student attitudes
toward violence in the media. The second will study developmental
issues in boys' attitudes and will be overseen by Dr. William
Pollack, a Harvard Medical School faculty member who has written two
books on issues of boys and men in society. Dr. Pollack has also
spoken in front of the faculty and at the Boys' Schools Coalition
Conference. If parents have any concerns about their sons participating
in these surveys, please let our office know."
Pollack's surveys were
administered to all the pupils in grades 7-9 at the same time
in two separate locations at the all-boy school. The head of the
middle school, Deborah Callahan, was in charge and Pollack was
present.
Pollack appears to have
violated the American Psychological Association's Ethical Standard
6.11, (c) through (e), which states, "When psychologists
conduct research with individuals such as students or subordinates,
psychologists take special care to protect the prospective participants
from adverse consequences of declining or withdrawing from participation."
The Ethical Standard
also says that, "The psychologist must make an effort to
protect such individuals from any adverse consequences of declining
or withdrawing, such as a lowering of a grade or evaluation, loss
of privileges, or any other negative consequence over which the
researcher has some degree of control." It goes on to state,
"Investigators must obtain participant's clear assent or
agreement to participate."
Parents Concerned
Concern was expressed
by parents about the methods used and the headmaster wrote a two-page
letter to all parents about a week later. He said that he has
seen Pollack as a "strong, articulate advocate for boys and
boys' schools." And in the next sentence, the Headmaster
gave as his basis for this opinion the following illogical statement:
"Indeed, he is
about to testify in California as an expert witness in an already
celebrated case where a young girl seeks to join the Boy Scouts.
Part of why we have allowed him to work at Belmont Hill is that
he has been an outspoken advocate for the rights and needs of
boys."
Related Stories:
Questions Used by Dr. Pollack
to Disparage American Boys
Background Articles from our
January Edition
Pollack
became famous saying girls are better than boys
Terrible
advice about homosexuality
Is
Pollack behind homosexual speaker at Belmont Hill School?
Professor
wonders if Pollack’s interviews are ‘fiction’
Pollack
is proud of membership in group ‘studying’ men
Pollack
does get around
Pollack
attracts the irresponsible
Soundbites from William Pollack's Real Boys
Soundbites from Christina Hoff Somers The War Against Boys
Who
says, 'men are more violent?'
When
the ‘boy code’ was really tough
Some of us remember when women were cherished, protected
|
|
|