Despite Drop in Population,
Boston Area is Number One in Competiveness, Says Beacon Hill Institute
The Suffolk
University-based Beacon Hill Institute has announced that for the
first time for the metro area and the second consecutive year for
the state, Boston and Massachusetts as a whole outrank all other states
and metro areas in terms of its economic competitiveness. The study
paints a very positive picture for the state, which holds the unfortunate
distinction of being the only state to lose population for two consecutive
years.
The Boston
metro area finished up from last year's fourth place finish.
According to the Beacon Hill Institute press release, in the state
ranking, Utah finished second while New Hampshire ranked third, improving
from its 7th place ranking in 2004. Louisiana finished last. The Los
Angeles metropolitan area finished last due to its poor performance
in several broad measures. The Institute defines competitiveness as
"the policies and conditions that ensure and sustain a higher
level of per capita income and its continued growth."
The 2005 Report assigns
more than three dozen variables to eight categories - government and
fiscal policy, security, infrastructure, human resources, technology,
business incubation, openness, and environmental policy - and combined
these eight measures into a single "competitiveness index".
"This year's report
should go a long way toward dispelling recent, gloomy assessments
of the state's economy," said David G. Tuerck, BHI Executive
Director. "Looking at just one or two economic indicators can,
as we see, prove misleading. Despite slow job growth and population
loss, Massachusetts continues to be an attractive place to live and
work. In fact, chambers of commerce and planners across the nation
should look to Massachusetts as a role model for economic competitiveness."
Massachusetts and the Boston
metro area rise to the top based on its competitive advantages in
technology, business incubation, human resources and openness. These
strengths more than offset areas in which the state is weak: infrastructure
and environmental policy.Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington
are high-tech states that continue to challenge Massachusetts' competitiveness.
This is the fifth year that BHI has published a Competitiveness Report.
All competitiveness reports will be available at www.beaconhill.org.