Special Bulletin
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld Was Savaged by Pinch Sulzberger on the Holy Weekend of Both Christians and Jews
Brit Hume Reveals the Truth About the Accusations
            Even though the “news” that six U.S. generals have never liked Donald Rumsfeld could have been released by Pinch Sulzberger in his New York Times any day in recent months, he waited until the Holy weekend of Easter and Passover in an attempt to personally destroy Rumsfeld, whose family was not allowed any respite over the weekend from their hectic life of service to their country.
            Many observers quickly remembered Sulzberger being listed first by Bernie Goldberg in his book “100 People Who Are Screwing Up America”, coming only behind Michael Moore, who was actually listed first but did not receive a formal story.
    The following tells how Bernie feels about Sulzberger:   
            “It seems that back in the 60s, when young Pinch was such a committed student activist against the war in Vietnam that he was twice arrested in antiwar protests, his exasperated father, then-Times publisher, Arthur Sulzberger Sr., asked him a simple question: ‘If a young American soldier comes upon a young Vietnamese soldier, which one do you want to see get shot?’
            “Pinch didn’t even hesitate. It was, he said, ‘the dumbest question I ever heard in my life,’ adding ‘I would want to see the American get shot.  It’s the other guy’s country.’”
            Now that Pinch is in total charge at the Times he still believes that any foreign military personnel --- including those in Iraq --- who are shooting at American soldiers deserve our praise and protection.
              Fox News Keeps Muzzle on Brit Hume- Until Monday Night
            Brit Hume was not allowed by Fox News Sunday on “Fox News Sunday” to reveal the truth. He was just one of four panelists alongside Juan Williams & Mara Liasson from the radical-left National Public Radio and the Neo-Conservative Bill Kristol, Publisher of The Weekly Standard (which is owned by Fox News without notice to its listeners).
            Hume was not given the time then to reveal the sordid details of the personal attack by Sulzberger and his New York Times on Donald Rumsfeld.
           However on Monday night, Hume was able to go on the offensive about the opinions of the generals who were now criticizing Rumsfeld. The most prominent of the critics is retired General Anthony Zinni, who is quoted as saying ""What bothered me ... [was that] I was hearing a depiction of the intelligence that didn't fit what I knew. There was no solid proof, that I ever saw, that Saddam had WMD."
           However, Brit Hume was quick to point out that General Zinni was saying the exact opposite thing in the months and years leading up to the United States involvment in Iraq. General Zinni said in early 2000 before Congress that:
          "Iraq remains the most significant near-term threat to U.S. interests in the Arabian Gulf region... Iraq probably is continuing clandestine nuclear research, [and] retains stocks of chemical and biological munitions ... Even if Baghdad reversed its course and surrendered all WMD capabilities, it retains scientific, technical, and industrial infrastructure to replace agents and munitions within weeks or months."
           With that revelation, Hume decisively put to rest the credibility of the retired generals criticizing Donald Rumsfeld.