Rep.
Emile Goguen Will Serve another Eleven Months
Plenty of Time Left to Remove Judge Marshall
By MassNews Staff
Even
though Rep. Emile Goguen (D-Fitchburg) announced over the weekend that
he will be retiring at the end of this term, that will not occur for
another eleven months --- at the end of 2006. Therefore, Judge Margaret
Marshall has no cause for celebration.
The news of Goguen’s
retirement was apparently reported to every newspaper and radio station
in the state by A.P. inasmuch as radio station WBZ reported it with
its 50,000 watts yesterday at five in the morning.
Neither
the Boston Globe, the Herald nor any of the other Massachusetts media
reported anything in their print newspapers or on the Internet that
we were able to discover.
Both
the Globe and the Herald are censoring news about Rep. Goguen because
he is actively working to Remove Judge Marshall along with the three
Associate Justices who signed her illegal ruling.
The
three Associate Justices who refused to sign Marshall's ruling are passionate
that she is violating the state Constitution which she has taken an
oath to uphold. When she spoke to the state's "Gay & Lesbian
Bar Association" in 1999 and promised to approve a lawsuit for
gay marriage if they brought one in this state, she also cited the law
from her native South Africa with approval. In her ruling in 2003 which
imposed gay marriage upon the state, she cited the law of South Africa,
not Massachusetts, as precedent for her ruling. Judge Marshall did not
come to this country until she was 26-years-old.
Goguen Assures MassNews that He Will Not be Leaving
until the End of 2006
After hearing the WBZ report yesterday
morning, we questioned Rep. Goguen.
Had
he changed his mind? Was he leaving the legislature immediately because
of health reasons? He assured us he has never felt better, nor been
more popular throughout his district nor the rest of the state.
He emphasized that he has worked with Judge
Marshall for years because he has been a member of the Committee which
approves her budgets. He was surprised and disappointed when she wrote
her illegal opinion on gay marriage.
He also has had good
relations with the gay community in Fitchburg and believes they must
be protected the same as other citizens, but he does not believe the
state should do anything to encourage anyone, particularly teenagers,
to follow that unhealthy life.