The Graham Family with Their "Washington Post"
and "Newsweek" Magazine Begins to Target Massachusetts
Are They Getting Even
with Pinch Sulzberger for His Nasty Removal of Them as Partners in the
International Herald Tribune Based in Paris?
Although the Graham family of Washington
is supposed to be friends with the Sulzberger family, the nasty removal
of them by Pinch as equal partners in the "International Herald
Tribune" was obviously not well received by the Washington-based
Graham family.
Now that they see The
New York Times Company floundering with Pinch as Chairman, this is the
perfect time to get even.
Both companies are
in a race to expand into Europe and become the first "world-wide"
newspaper. The Sulzbergers made a coup when Pinch unfairly ousted them
from the Tribune.
Of course it will not
do residents of Massachusetts any good to have another huge company
managing our news. What we need is the return of the small independent
publisher we had before Fidelity Investments acquired every weekly newspaper
in the Boston area in an attempt to make a lot of money. They failed
in that effort and sold out to the Boston Herald.
In spite of all that,
we can and are returning to independent publishers as a result of the
tremendous growth of the Internet. It will not be long before the huge
presses printing newspapers and the trucks carrying them everywhere
will be a relic of the past. Everyone will be getting their news from
a high-speed printer connected to a computer in their home. The major
question that no one has really solved is how the major publishers will
turn this into a profitable business.
But that problem is
welcomed by the small, independent people who are already making the
Internet a powerful tool to reach over the New York Times and Washington
Post. The satellite radio phenomenon will now allow them to also have
a radio station without huge towers and a large investment. There will
be tremendous diversity both on the Net and on the radio.
How Are the Grahams Targeting Massachusetts?
The Graham family is just as liberal as the Sulzbergers. They
have never presented both sides, as did Adolph Ochs, the founder of
the modern Times in 1896. As the son of Jewish immigrants, Ochs truly
loved America and the opportunities it had given him as his status and
power expanded beyond his wildest dreams.
But Ochs was totally
shattered when his only child, Iphigene, who suffered from dyslexia,
became a big liberal while attending Columbia University near their
home. She was an easy target for any professor who wanted to attack
the conservative Ochs. She married Arthur Hays Sulzberger, who was a
suave, handsome ladies man. He took over the Times merely by marrying
his way into the Ochs family. He never pretended to love Iphigene and
had many mistresses over the years who were constantly present in the
family's home, the most serious being Madeleine Carroll, a famous, beautiful
English actress, who became a permanent fixture in the Sulzberger home.
When Sulzberger took
over in 1935 after the death of Ochs, he immediately stopped printing
both sides of the stories. The Times ceased being a "newspaper
of record" which printed both sides of everything. It was transformed
overnight into a liberal newspaper printing the beliefs of Arthur Sulzberger,
his son Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (Punch) and his grandson, Arthur Ochs
Sulzberger, Jr. (Pinch).
Coming Tomorrow:
How the Grahams Are Intruding into Massachusetts and Challenging the
Sulzberger Monopoly