Freedom Will Conquer Racism
Many Mass. Politicians Are Trembling at
Fate of Tom Birmingham and Tom Finneran; Speaker DiMasi Is Too Smart to
Break the Law
Mass. politicians tremble at the memory of Tom Birmingham and Tom Finneran,
who were the most powerful politicians in the state a couple of years
ago until they broke the law in order to help homosexual ”marriage”.
However, Speaker Sal DiMasi
is not one of those who are trembling, inasmuch as he has promised to
allow a fair vote on a “Resolution” to remove the four SJC judges who
imposed homosexual marriage on the state in 2003 and 2004. The Speaker
is a practicing lawyer, a shrewd man who may help the Democrats recover
from the perilous position they now occupy by the simple strategy of embracing
the “Resolution” from Representative Emile Goguen (D-Fitchburg).
Hopefully, this short reminder
from us will help many of our readers recall their upset a few years ago
when our democracy was being destroyed by many of our politicians.
The following stories
were all printed in 2004. We have re-published them to keep in the forefront
the fact that the real issue here is not whether we pass another Amendment.
We already did that in 2002. Do you remember?
Stories Were Originally Posted on MassNews on Dec. 13, 2004)
Sal DiMasi Has Agreed to Allow a Vote on the
Removal of Four Judges from SJC
Will Soon Be History in Massachusetts
DiMasi (D-Boston) has privately assured legislators he will follow
the law and allow a vote to be taken in the House of Representatives
to “remove” the four judges who voted last year to force “gay marriage”
upon the state.
are now asking how this will work. What will take place?
What is important is that after the four judges are removed
from the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) by the House and then by the
Senate (which could happen in one day but will undoubtedly take more
time as those on the opposite side desperately try to stop the removal
process), the remaining judges will then be able to reverse the illegal
ruling that Chief Justice Margaret Marshall and three of the Associate
Judges imposed in November 2003.
This means that “gay marriage” will immediately be gone from
Massachusetts forever and homosexuals (the vast majority of whom have
no desire to get “married”) will be able to return to a normal life,
and the extreme feminists at NOW will have to accept the truth that
only a tiny number of women believe that traditional marriage is deleterious
to all women or wish it destroyed. Only a tiny few believe they are
“parasites” as the extremists tell them.
Understands What Happened to Birmingham and Finneran
Speaker DiMasi realizes
what happened to Tom Birmingham and Tom Finneran and has no desire
to watch the Democratic Party continue to self-destruct while under
his leadership. He saw the ambitions of Senate President Tom Birmingham
to be Governor destroyed when the Senator broke the law and violated
the state Constitution on July 17, 2002. Birmingham is now a private
lawyer and has publicly said that his dream was lost because he
broke the law.
DiMasi also understands
that former Speaker Tom Finneran is also a private lawyer now because
he, too, violated the state Constitution in 2002. (He personally
did not vote to violate the Constitution that year and pretended
to be against the violation, while letting Birmingham take the heat).
his unlawful activities again this year when he refused to allow
a vote to take place on the Resolution by Emile Goguen (D-Fitchburg)
to remove the four judges from the SJC. As a result, Finneran was
besieged with banner airplanes flying over his house on the Cape
last summer beginning on July 4
The Defeat of John Kerry Changed Everything
The defeat of John
Kerry changed everything when Democratic pundits immediately began
blaming Margaret Marshall and her opinion about “gay marriage”
for the loss of the Presidential election.
The Chairman of
the New York Times/Boston Globe conglomerate, Arthur O. Sulzberger,
Jr. (Pinch) immediately began to back away from his longtime friend,
Judge Marshall, (whose husband, Anthony Lewis, has been the premiere
columnist at the Times for decades) even though Pinch was the one
who had strongly encouraged the opinion and put the full weight
of the Globe behind Marshall’s appointment as Chief Justice
in 1999 so she could make the ruling.
between Sulzberger and Marshall has fallen apart with each of them
blaming the other and many bizarre things taking place.
Search our archives
for other articles from Massachusetts News.
Not Unfair to Judges
The opposition will
attempt to say that the “removal” process is “unfair”
to the four judges even though all the rules of fairness will be
followed. The removal of sitting judges was included by John Adams
in the Constitution he wrote for our state in 1780. He knew that
all human beings have faults and that with the tremendous power
that judges possess, it is inevitable that some will become oppressors.
Therefore, Adams included the removal process which merely requires
a simple majority in the House and in the Senate.
Regardless of which
way a Senator or Rep votes, he must face the citizens at the next
election and explain his vote. This process understandably frightens
most legislators because they want to hide. They prefer the Amendment
process which occurred last spring when no one could agree whether
any vote was for or against traditional marriage.
Such confusion is
what many legislators desire. But that will not happen after the
removal process has taken place. It will be absolutely clear to
everyone where every legislator stands on the issue.
The judges cannot
complain because each one of them will be debated about and voted
on separately under Rep. Goguen’s Resolution.
(This Story was Originally Posted on MassNews On July 6, 2004)
Airplane Banner Delights Bathers on Cape Cod; But Not Speaker
This 200-foot banner with 5-foot letters
flies off to delight Cape Cod bathers last Saturday and Sunday,
but not House Speaker Finneran, who was at his vacation home
for the holiday.
The banner, "FINNERAN - LET THE REPS VOTE," was carried
from one end of the Cape to the other and back again by Murray
Randall and Aero Ads in Berkley.
(This Story was Originally Posted on MassNews on March 30, 2004)
The Silver Lining
in Yesterday's Vote
By MassNews Staff
legislature approved an amendment yesterday that no one will want
to vote for.
the good guys in this battle, Rep. Vinny DeMacedo (R-Kingston) explains,
"No problem, you can vote to define marriage as between a man
and a woman, but the only way you can do so is by creating civil unions
that are entirely the same as marriage." Ultimately, if this
ever makes it to the ballot, it will fail.
legislators covered all the bases in their own interest. Representatives
and Senators are now able to say that they voted to define marriage
as a man and a woman, at the same time giving the homosexual lobby
all the legal trappings of marriage without the title. (The title
would come in a few more years.) At the same time, they were able
to console the homosexual lobby that opposition to so-called 'civil
unions' from traditionalists would undoubtedly result in the rejection
of the amendment at the ballot box.
vote was a defeat for those who recognize that marriage has always
been one man and one woman. And despite the pleadings of Governor
Romney, the Supreme Judicial Court is not going to postpone implementation
of the Goodridge decision. ....READ