|
|
Senate President: Let's Wait and See for Now on
Stem Cell Funding
By Jim O’Sullivan for the State House News Service
Top Massachusetts Democrats
today pushed for passage of Congressional legislation that would legalize
certain stem cell research methods and, still confident from overriding
Tuesday’s gubernatorial veto of a similar bill here, showed a preference
for federal funding of the biomedical practices, rather than state support.
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy said
the U.S. Senate should follow the Bay State’s lead in embracing
stem cell research, which scientists and medical experts say could lead
to significant advances into curing degenerative and debilitating diseases.
Kennedy said American scientists already trail South Korean advances because
of the government’s unwillingness to offer the capital necessary
to conduct the research.
Joining the state’s senior
senator for a roundtable discussion at a Cambridge biomedical company,
Senate President Robert Travaglini and House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi
praised the senator for tackling the matter at the national level, where
some conservatives feel it violates ethical boundaries by creating and
then destroying life.
Travaglini signaled that he
would hold back on pushing state fiscal support of stem cell research
pending the outcome of federal legislative negotiations. He hopes to see
regulations lifted so that the National Institutes of Health, the biomedical
field’s traditional leading funding
source, to begin bankrolling research. The East Boston Democrat said the
state might revisit whether or not to provide the funding “in the
fall,”
based on the federal government’s handling of the issue.
“That is at some future
point in time after we have a chance to see the effectiveness of this
first phase of the campaign,” pointing to the legalization of the
research as the initial step,” he said. “I think he inclines
to agree with the researchers that the federal government is the appropriate
source of funding,” said Travaglini spokeswoman Ann Dufresne, who
said the Legislature is “not actively considering” any bills
that would award public money to researchers. “You’ve got
to wait and see what will happen now that the research is legal,”
Dufresne said in a telephone interview. “You’ve got to wait
and see if this frees up private funding.”
Kennedy expressed confidence
that the measure approved last week by the House and now on Senate Majority
Leader Bill Frist’s desk – which allows federal money to support
experiments using fertility clinics’ leftover
embryos – would garner the necessary votes.
“I think it’ll pass
overwhelmingly,” Kennedy said. Kennedy said that stem cell legislation
could highlight a Senate year that so far has been dominated by internal
parliamentary debates about filibustering. Other than bankruptcy reform
and a supplemental troop-support bill, he said, “The rest of it
has been a pretty empty performance [in dealing] with real people’s
problem, real people’s needs.” He said, “I don’t
think there’s anything that’s more important that we’re
going to do.”
David Page, interim director
of the Whitehead Institute, said science could be poised on the threshold
of a period of discovery similar to the windfall of breakthroughs that
occurred after 1953, when James Watson and Francis Crick discovered the
double helix structure of DNA – a finding that led to significant
insights into the human genetic code.
“In some sense, we’re
at the very beginning of what might be a half-century or more of the coming-of-age
of stem cell study,” Page said.
Travaglini said national Democrats should follow the same strategy advocates
of the practice used in Massachusetts, educating policy-makers
and the public about the potential benefits of the research, and the distinct
difference he said existed between its bioethical implications and
actual human cloning.
DiMasi called the passage of
the stem cell bill “one of the most important votes” in Massachusetts
history. In a cramped second-floor conference room at the Whitehead Institute
in Kendall Square, advocates with immediate and personal vested interests
joined the politicians and scientists. Toby Yarmolinsky, whose body trembles
due to Parkinson’s disease, described how the degenerative neurological
disease makes tasks like getting out of bed and using the phone more difficult.
“I’m someone who
believes that finding a cure is better than just looking for treatments,”
Yarmolinsky said.
Type II diabetes forces 15-year-old
Adam Roose, a freshman at
Lincoln-Sudbury High School, to get out of bed every two hours sometimes,
he said, to eat and check his blood sugar level. It leaves him tired the
next day during school and sports practice, he said.
“After the sports, it’s
a really huge problem, because I go low all night
long,” he said, adding that he checks his blood sugar level between
10 and 15 times per day.
Experts say embryonic stem cell research offers them glimpses into some
diseases that adult stem cells do not offer. The regulatory hindrances
on
their efforts, they say, do not outright prevent the practice, but slow
it
down.
On Wednesday night, said Dr.
George Daley, a Harvard Medical School
professor and Children’s Hospital pediatrician, he treated three
children
for sickle cell anemia. Loosened strictures and increased funding, he
said,
could have prevented the children from enduring the effects of the illness.“It’s
that kind of disease – which is an extremely painful disease, it’s
a debilitating disease – that we have been studying for 50 years
and need a fresh approach,” Daley said.
Thomas Finneran, president of
the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council and former Speaker of the House,
also attended the session, but sat in shirtsleeves off to the side along
a wall. Under federal investigation for possibly perjuring himself during
testimony about a House redistricting
plan, Finneran left the meeting before Kennedy, Travaglini, and DiMasi
addressed reporters. Joshed about his casual attire during the session,
he
joked, “Senator, I’m in perfect uniform. No ties. We’re
into research.”
|

|