![]() |
|---|
|
Red v. Blue, Shame on Us “W. ran a jihad in America so he can fight one in Iraq -- drawing a devoted flock of evangelicals, or ''values voters,'' as they call themselves (italics are mine), to the polls by opposing abortion, suffocating stem cell research and supporting a constitutional amendment against gay marriage.” Ms. Dowd apparently doesn’t care for those who vote according to their religious conscience, unless the votes correspond with her world view. Yet, the pundits
on the right were just as uncharitable to those on the other side. Ann Coulter couldn’t resist taking a few potshots
of her own. In her November 18th
column she wrote, “Democrats are saying to voters: How can you be so
stupid to subordinate your own selfish economic interests to "moral
values," the betterment of the country and the general welfare of
people you don't even know?” Neither of these otherwise brilliant, accomplished
women leaves any room for the possibility that some voters might have
honestly agonized over the choice. Neither
account for the likelihood that many voters probably winced and grimaced
as they cast their vote for the “lesser of two evils.” Analysis that labels honest, faith-filled Americans
as either Red State or Blue State adherents cheapens the heart of people
of faith. In his recent book, God’s Politics: Why
the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn’t Get It, politically progressive
evangelical pastor Jim Wallis quite properly casts political stones at
both political camps. The Rev. Wallis is on target as he observes
that in many cases, conservatives have merely cloaked their politics in
religious jargon to win support for the Republican Party. He’s equally on target when he critiques the left as arrogantly
asserting that people who believe the Bible are ignorant, uneducated dolts
who base their lives on fairy tales. The
truth is, and as painful as it may be to admit, neither political party
completely represents a Biblical world view. The Rev. Wallis makes his best contributions
to the pubic debate when he says that there is a very proper place for
people of faith in politics. Rev.
Wallis eloquently states the case for faith in the public discourse when
he writes, “The separation of church and state does not require banishing
moral and religious values from the public square.
In fact, America’s social fabric depends on such values and vision
to shape our politics—a dependence the founder’s recognized.” He continues, “It is indeed possible (and necessary)
to express one’s faith and convictions about public policy while still
respecting the pluralism of American democ-racy.” Amen! People of faith have always been in the forefront
of the great reform movements. In Britain, it was the Rev. John Wesley who
sowed the seeds of the abolitionist movement.
It was the Christian member of Parliament William Wilberforce who
began a thirty year crusade to pass laws to outlaw it throughout the British
Empire. The truth of the matter is that people of faith
have always been involved in America’s greatest social movements. While some churches fraudulently interpreted
the Scriptures to justify slavery, it was Northern Baptists and Methodists
who championed the abolitionist movement.
People of faith like William Jennings Bryan championed the cause
to abolish child labor. No one can dispute the impact people of faith
like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Rev. Ralph Abernathy had on the
Civil Rights movement. The bottom line is this.
Regardless of what the poisoned word processor of any columnist
says, people of faith have a rightful place in the arena of ideas.
Political discourse properly informed by a faith clothed in the
mercy of God will always make a healthy contribution to American life
and public policy. Michael Carl is
a resident of Lynn, Massachusetts, pastor of a church in Wakefield, MA
and is president of The Heritage Alliance, a public policy research group. |
|---|
| Copyright 2008 ©All Rights Reserved
MassNews.com® 508-410-2087 |
|---|