Haters Are Radical Feminists from NOW, Not Homosexuals
            When still flush from their “victory” on July 17, 2002, where the Democratic legislature violated the state Constitution and refused to vote on and thus illegally but effectively, killed the Protection of Marriage Amendment, Bay Windows published a congratulatory editorial. In it, they revealed that the main proponents of homosexual “marriage,” are not male homosexuals but radical feminists from NOW and their allies, who hate men. Their agenda is to destroy traditional marriage in any way they can because they believe it hurts all women.
            (Anyone interested in the agenda of NOW and their friends, should read Atty. Pawlick’s book written in 1998, “Freedom Will Conquer Racism and Sexism,” which narrates this fascinating story.)
            Bay Windows confirmed that it was powerful, national forces from the AFL-CIO, ACLU, Anti-Defamation League, NOW and other liberals who were behind the illegal adjournment of the vote on the Protection of Marriage Amendment on July 17. It indicated that most homosexuals are not interested in the subject. It was like pulling teeth to get them to contribute to the effort, one activist reported.
            "This confirms what we have been saying," said Sally Pawlick. "This is not about homosexuality. It's about a powerful, liberal agenda to change our morality. These liberals are seeking a socialist state similar to Sweden or Cuba, with a free-love society in which children are the responsibility of the state, not their parents. That's why the national, liberal organizations are so interested in what is happening in Massachusetts. They’re hiding behind homosexuals and others to achieve their political objectives. They wish to diminish the institution of marriage which has been the bedrock of our country since its founding."
            Bay Windows emphasized the importance of liberal allies when it wrote: "Gays and lesbians cannot win these fights on their own. They must have strong and committed straight allies, such as labor unions and the ACLU." It also listed other organizations and said, "Our hats are off to them."
            The ACLU trained hundreds of “blockers” to harass voters attempting to sign petitions in 2001. This was an illegal violation of voting rights and caused concern about the safety of  petition gatherers. Bay Windows bragged: "As a result, the petitioners received thousands fewer signatures than they otherwise would have." Soliciting signatures in public places is protected by the U.S. and Massachusetts Constitutions, according to a Memo from the Secretary of State dated Aug. 30, 2001. The “blockers” operated mostly at malls.