|
Purchase
of “Boston Metro” Newspaper by New York Times is in Jeopardy over Charges
of Racism
The purchase
of the “Boston Metro” newspaper by the New York Times is now in jeopardy
after the revelation this week of racist remarks by the Metro’s managers.
Two of its top executives were forced to resign in recent days
over racist remarks made at company meetings during the last year.
The forced resignations were apparently an effort to salvage the
pending deal with the New York Times.
The Times
Company, which also owns the Boston Globe, has been receiving calls from
black, civil rights leaders about why it would be considering purchasing
a company that discriminates again black people.
The Times has been considering a $16.5 million deal to purchase
49% of the free daily paper.
``They're
going to have to back out of this deal,'' the Rev. Jeffrey Brown yesterday,
pastor of the Union Baptist Church in Cambridge has said. ``This isn't
subtle stuff. This is the kind of stuff we'd expect in the Deep South
50 years ago. What does this say about the Globe? What does this say about
the New York Times?''
Janis Pryor,
a political consultant who has worked for Jesse Jackson has stated: ``This
is alarming and very upsetting. Shame
on the Globe and the Times. It's time for them to walk their talk. …I
think many black people will start to regard the Times and the Globe as
limousine liberals who don't walk their talk.''
The
Times Company, under its Chairman Pinch Sulzberger, has been no stranger
to controversy involving racism. The
Jayson Blair fiasco in 2003 left an indelible mark on the reputation of
the Times, which Sulzberger was forced to fire his two top editors, both
close friends. This scandal was spawned by hiring practices which promoted
employees based on ethnic lines and skin color, rather than on performance.
The Times
has issued a public statement regarding the latest revelations about the
Boston Metro. It said: “We are closely reviewing the steps that Metro International is taking to
address recent reports of inappropriate comments by some of its staff
and the process it pursues to ensure that it adheres to the highest standards
of corporate behavior.”
The Times was
silent, however, regarding Sulzberger’s involvement in the latest flap
over racism at the Metro or whether to whether the Times may renege on
the acquisition over the row.
Related Resources:
Freedom
Will Conquer Racism and Sexism
Libel by New York Times
MassNews Archives:Jayson
Blair and the NYT
|