Kerry Must Act on Charge that Judge Marshall Assured Homosexual Attorney She Would Win Lawsuit about Marriage

     John Kerry will be in serious trouble when he arrives at his Boston Convention next month if he doesn’t resolve the homosexual marriage crisis in his home state before then, says Sally Pawlick, President of Massachusetts Citizens for Marriage.

     “This state is in a furor over the revelation that Justice Margaret Marshall assured the attorney for the homosexual plaintiffs, Mary Bonauto, that she would win if she brought her suit here in Massachusetts,” says Pawlick. “This corruption couldn’t be any worse. The stench is nauseating.”

     A state Representative, Emile Goguen (D-Fitchburg), has filed a Resolution under the state Constitution for the “Removal” of Marshall and the three judges who went along with her scheme. There must now be a vote by each Chamber on the Resolution. This is not an impeachment process which requires formal charges. However, Goguen has filed an Indictment which lists four charges against the judges.

    The Chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Terry McAuliffe, told the Boston Globe last December that he didn’t want homosexual marriage to be an important issue at the convention. “It’s not going to happen,” he said. But Pawlick says the Chairman is heading for a surprise if he doesn’t wake up.

     Kerry was trapped by Tim Russert on “Face the Nation” in 2002, when he agreed that the Democratic legislature should have allowed the legislators to vote on the “Protection of Marriage Amendment,” which was sponsored by Pawlick’s organization and would have prohibited the state Supreme Court from imposing homosexual marriage. But, according to Pawlick, Kerry has not made one peep since talking with Russert about that flagrant violation of the state Constitution.

     “Now the same Democratic legislature is once again trying to stop the legislators from voting. It appears as though the Democrats in Massachusetts don’t like to see anything happen in the open with votes being taken. Are we to believe that all the Democrats of the nation are as corrupt as those in Massachusetts? Or might they be startled when they learn the truth after they arrive?”

     The leaders of the state Democratic Committee are also responsible for much of the problem. According to a story in the Boston Globe on January 30, the Party leaders backed a resolution advocating “unambiguous support for gay civil marriage,” while they ignored “deep divisions in the party’s ranks.”

     The Globe quoted the state Chairman that the vote “sends a clear message to the nation.” The paper said the Chairman “thinks” the rest of the state will support it. But he was wrong, said Pawlick. “The vast majority of the state, Democrats included, disagree with him.”