|
|
Money Flowing into Massachusetts from Homosexual Circles
“Around the World” Is Staggering
Is Worldwide Prostitution
the Goal?
One of the
Democratic leaders told us yesterday that the amount of money flowing
into the state from homosexual circles “around the world” is staggering.
He does not know why it is coming to Massachusetts, but he is very concerned.
Other persons hypothesize
that the “mob” and “prostitution” are undoubtedly involved. After all,
the mob has always used prostitution as a profitable business and has
had plenty of experience doing so legally in Nevada for a number of years.
There’s no dispute that
the mob is heavily into the politics of Rhode Island, Massachusetts and
other New England states.
There’s also no question
that the extreme feminists at NOW have promoted prostitution as a valid
way for women to earn money and believe it should be legalized. These
extreme feminists are also the prime movers behind homosexual “marriage”
in Massachusetts because they believe it will hasten the demise of traditional
marriage. They believe the traditional family is deleterious to women.
They want the children to be raised by the state so that the women are
not burdened by that responsibility. They want the age of consent that
a child can have sex to be lowered to twelve-years so that any person
over that age may consent to having sex. Of course, that means that the
mob will be able to legally have prostitutes who are aged as young as
twelve years.
Of course, the mob does
not care whether their prostitutes are teenage girls or boys. They will
furnish any sex of teenager that the customer desires.
The only problem with
their plan to go worldwide is the United States. It now stands as the
single barrier to the goal of the mob to go worldwide with their prostitution
plans. The countries in Europe have totally abdicated any sense of morality
and are now as “open” as Nevada.
The rest of the world
even has traffic in child slaves who are forced into prostitution and
are moved around the world as needed.
But the morality of the
entire United States has now been set into jeopardy by the illegal actions
of four rogue judges in Massachusetts.
The illegal tactics appear
to be coming from the highest levels of the Democratic Party and the leadership
in the House.
After all, these illegal
tactics have been used for years and none of the libertarian “reformers” in the state have cared. The “meeting”
on Wednesday was undoubtedly the first “meeting” that has been attempted
in years. It was such a strange occurrence that the members didn’t know
what they were supposed to do. They were honestly amazed to be informed
by us that they were required to hold public meetings regularly and minutes
must be taken for public inspection. Instead, what has been happening
in recent years is that the Chairman makes all the decisions himself,
sometimes talking privately with some members. This is totally illegal
and the fact that it is happening cannot be unknown to the leadership.
It must also be known by the “reformers” who constantly tell us that social
conservatives are irrelevant to the process as long as taxes are low and
business is prospering. But since when are morality, decency and honor
unimportant to a democracy?
We have witnessed
corruption of the worst sort in our Supreme Judicial Court with Chief
Justice Margaret Marshall assuring Attorney Mary Bonauto she would win
if she brought a lawsuit in Marshall’s court. Three other judges agreed
to go along with that corruption.
We are now being told
confidentially that perhaps something should be done to Marshall, but
not the other judges, even though John Greaney has been a judge for almost
thirty years and has led the attack almost more than Marshall. The other
two have either been asleep or complicit in what has happened. Some say
we cannot remove Roderick Ireland because he is black. What an insult
to black people to say that Ireland must be held to a lower standard because
of the color of his skin. What will I say to the three of my grandchildren
who also happen to have black skin? If the legislators wish to hold that
only Marshall must be removed, that is their decision but neither I, nor
anyone else, has the power to plea bargain for the people. A valid Resolution
has been brought by Rep. Goguen and the legislators must vote on that
Resolution, whether they wish to or not. They have the right and the duty
to vote as they believe to be correct, knowing that no matter how they
vote, some of their constituents are going to disagree at the next election.
We have no choice
but to continue to pressure the legislators, who are beginning to understand
that this is much different from 2002. The entire state is upset and becoming
more so every day. A vote on the House floor will have to be taken with
every Rep voting. They cannot avoid it.
|
