|
|---|
 |
News Analysis Homosexuality and Sadomasicism at Core of Iraq Prison Scandal It’s becoming clear that the core of the Iraq prison scandal is, at least in part, the growing influence of homosexuals in our culture. But American newspapers are afraid to say that, largely because of the New York Times/Boston Globe complex, which is owned by Chairman Arthur O. Sulzberger, Jr., an apologist for homosexuals and also the prime advocate of homosexual “marriage” in our state and across the country. He is also a chief critic of President Bush and the war in Iraq. The first rays of the truth were published today by Robert Knight of Concerned Women for America in WorldNet Daily. He says: “We were told homosexuality is harmless and normal, and the military should live with a ‘don't ask, don't tell’ policy that allows homosexuals to stay in the barracks. We were told that men ‘marrying’ men and women ‘marrying’ women is inevitable – not only for America, but for the world. Imagine how those images of men kissing men outside San Francisco City Hall after being ‘married’ play in the Muslim world. We couldn't offer the mullahs a more perfect picture of American decadence.” There’s More Knight says much more. He advises that we do the following immediately: “Enforce the military's ban on homosexuality. Congress enacted a ban in 1993 that bars military service for anyone with a ‘propensity’ for homosexuality. The ‘don't ask, don't tell’ rule instituted by the Clinton administration violates the law. Congress [or the President, irrespective of the desires of Dick Cheney’s daughter] needs to junk ‘don't ask, don't tell,’ and to reinstall the question about homosexuality on induction applications. It's time to restore the military's reputation as a place of honor and morality that inspires an entire culture. … “Strengthen state and federal marriage laws and cease the creation of civil unions and domestic partnerships. These counterfeits make a mockery of marriage and send the message to children that homosexual behavior is normal and healthy. The state has no business creating incentives to engage in immoral and dangerous activity. “Demand that schools stop promoting ‘safe sex’ and homosexuality in the name of ‘AIDS education’ or ‘safe schools.’ These are recruitment schemes into early sex and homosexuality, with documented, ghastly results.” We still don’t know what really happened in the prison. Columnist Walter Williams says: “Among the pictures I saw were: Pfc. Lynndie England with a dog leash tied to a naked Iraqi. Iraqi prisoners forced to parade naked before their jeering captors. Two American soldiers -- a male and a female -- forcing a group of Iraqi prisoners into simulating group sex. An American female soldier playing with two naked Iraqi captives. A British soldier urinating on an Iraqi prisoner. Of the pictures I saw, the worst acts shown were an Iraqi woman being gang-raped and an American soldier putting a rifle butt to an Iraqi prisoner's groin.” According to columnist Kathleen Parker: “Some of those images reportedly capture American soldiers beating an Iraqi prisoner almost to death, having sex with a female Iraqi prisoner and ‘acting inappropriately with a dead body.’ A videotape reportedly shows Iraqi guards raping boys.” All of that can accurately be described as kinky-sex practiced by homosexuals. Will we ever be allowed to learn how many of these guards who have seriously damaged our military are homosexuals? Don’t we have the “right” to find out? Other Wars Were Not Different Atty. J. Edward Pawlick, Publisher of this paper, was a seaman in the Navy at the end of World War II and drafted as a private in the Infantry for Korea. He just missed combat because he was on a troopship when Eisenhower ended the war in 1953. Before he shipped over, he was a guard at a prison stockade where our own troops were imprisoned. “These were mostly young seventeen-year-olds whose only sin was that they missed their homes while in basic training. The FBI was sent by the Truman administration to tear those youngsters from their homes and send them back to the stockade. I truly feared that place and that was the purpose of it. There was a tiny building, called a “black-box,” without windows where the recalcitrant ones went. We heard stories of what happened in there. It was frightening. And these were our own soldiers. “Although I did not like either the Navy or the Army, I was impressed how the top officers were able to take a mob of unhappy men and make them into an Army. I will never understand why the liberals blame the military instead of people like Truman who blundered us into fighting the Chinese Army. “When you have that many men in an Army, you will always have a few bad apples, particularly when the commanders are forbidden from “hurting someone’s feelings.” The object of war is not to make people happy. “The people of this country have not been behind any war since World War II. There was a huge difference between WWII and Korea in the way we in the service were treated. “Not only the women of America, but most of the men also, have little idea what it is like to fight in a war. It is not fun. ”If the top officers were really in charge of their units today, nothing like this would have happened, but it is not as bad as the New York Times/Boston Globe is portraying it with glee. Sulzberger has never been near the Army.” |
|
|
Archives | Letters | Bookshop |
