Opinion

We’re Pushing Boys Into Sexual Relationships  That Even Adults Have Trouble Handling
Sex Ed In Schools Is Serious Problem
By J. Edward Pawlick, Publisher

     Although the book, The War Against Boys, reveals much of what is taking place against our sons, it doesn’t include the main problem.

     This isn’t surprising because it would be difficult for any female to understand the issue.

      They don’t realize that the major problem for our teenage boys is a message they get in all our schools, thata boy must be sexually active or he will be considered “strange.” This is an awesome responsibility to be putting on teenagers. It has never been done before.

      Even adults must work very hard to develop a successful sexual relationship XXXX yet we are expecting teenagers to manage that in their spare time while educating themselves and learning to adjust in a complicated world.

     It’s similar to the pressure of Little League where many parents urge their sons to perform like adults when all the boys want to do is to go out and enjoy their childhood. Why do we try to push these young ones into these activities?

     How are teenage boys supposed to attract these girls that they are expected to have sex with? Should they buy their love? Do they need expensive cars and other luxuries? Are they supposed to play football and other sports to show their manliness? Or should they just physically attack the girls? And what are they supposed to do about the older guys who always appeal to the opposite sex, fight with those guys?

     Where are the young boys supposed to have their trysts? Unless they’re old enough and rich enough to have a car, how do they handle having sex? Where would you go to have sex without a car or house?

     And when the girl finds someone else she likes better or who is older, how is the teenager supposed to show his anger? Although they deny it, we know that every women likes a man who is “strong and virile.” Just how far can a teenager go in exhibiting those capacities without “going too far?” It’s all very difficult, even for a grown man to handle.

     As a society, we’re very smug and pompous that we had a sexual “revolution” in the 1960’s. Every woman is now “liberated.” For what, to be a sex object? The sexual “revolution” that occurred in the 1960s is a misnomer. It was not a “revolution” at all. It was a “reversion.” The real revolution occurred 4000 years earlier when the Jews were told to honor their wives. Although they didn’t all follow the rule, it was the established goal.

      Before the Jewish nation was established, women were used as sex objects all over the world. And they still are in most parts of the world today. The real revolution reached its high point with the founding of America with a Christian culture where most men, as individuals and as a society, did honor their wives. That is, they did until the feminists decided in the 1960s that they wanted to be sex objects again. And so we reverted to the old pagan customs which hold that the conquering of females is the most important function of a man’s life.

      But one must wonder, is it only casual sex that a woman seeks? Is she really looking only for a man who has the highest number of orgasms per minute? Is that honestly the criteria?

     Or is she looking for a lifetime of commitment, companionship and love?

     As Prof. Sommers writes in her book, there’s no question that men enjoy casual sex more than women do. So why are the feminists exacerbating that problem by insisting that sex be a type of physical sport? Nothing more, nothing less than playing tennis.

      That’s kind of fun for a boy for a while, until he realizes there are things he hasn’t been taught, like babies, abortions, disease, hurt feelings and many others. And no matter what happens: if it’s bad, it’s his fault.

     It’s easy to end a relationship when there hasn’t been any sexual intercourse. But when you head down that path, it becomes infinitely more difficult.

      Why are the mothers of girls allowing this to happen? Every girl you see today, almost without exception, is dressed so that all of her physical features are not only open to view but are “merchandised.” There is an uplift here and a downlift there so that those features are prominently displayed. No one can miss them. It’s almost as though the mothers are saying, “Here, service my little girl, please. You’ll like her.”

     Whether they acknowledge it or not, it is the women of any society who must tame the men and make them into reasonable creatures who will help to raise and support the children. Too many women in our society give the appearance of trying to do just the opposite.

     They appear to believe that men have “on” and “off” switches that women can push to make them more tractable. But the truth is that men don’t have such a switch and they never will.

      It was only a few years ago that almost everyone witnessed the tremendous power of male animals at some point in their lives. But today, almost no one does.

     How many people do you know who have ever held a Percheron stallion when a mare was in the vicinity? Or kept a 2200-pound Holstein bull in control when a cow is going by?

     Those who have done that know something about the tremendous strength and determination that can be triggered in a male animal when he is sexually aroused.

     It’s too bad that 99% of us have lost all contact with the animal world and know nothing of that experience. The only animal we know is a dog or cat that is neutered.

      Although most agree that a human is much more than an animal, we do possess the primal instincts. Do we want to intensify those animal instincts instead of those that women really covet in a man? Why do we teach our teenage boys that the girls are looking to a man only to satisfy their basic physical desires?

     As these complicated pressures of adulthood are being loaded onto our boys by the adults, it is remarkable that most of them are doing so well. But how about those boys who are not at the top of the “hunk” list among females, like the boys at Columbine High School? No wonder they hate the jocks and the rest of the teenagers. Their life has been made exponentially more difficult and they have been ridiculed because of the burdens that we have shifted onto them.

     The one place where they can find solace is in a gang.