Is Mutual-Masturbation a “Civil Right”?

Must we use that disgusting language? 
There’s no other way to explain what that evil woman, Margaret Marshall, is doing. If she stays, that language will be part of our culture forever. We must remove her by May 17.

Why be mean to the Goodridges?
We did not “out” the Goodridges. Their lawyer, Mary Bonauto, did. Everyone should understand what the Goodridges are requesting. No public discussion of this was ever held in Marshall’s presence before she mandated homosexual marriage. She made this decision quietly by herself while sitting in her office except for 37-minutes-and-11-seconds allowed to Mary Bonauto and a lawyer from the Attorney General.

What do the Goodridges request?
They want mutual-masturbation to be a civil right. The only difference between lesbians and regular women is that lesbians enjoy playing with each other’s sexual organs. It is not mysterious.

Isn’t it good that they love each other?
Of course it is, but most other women are also very fond of special friends with no desire to practice sex-games. Justice Marshall requires that happy, ordinary women must have sex with each other in order to receive state benefits.

But isn’t this all decided now?
No, tens of thousands are seeking to “remove” both Margaret Marshall and the three justices who obeyed her instructions.

That won’t stop gay marriage from starting on May 17, will it?
Yes, it will! In the last sentence of her opinion, Marshall sent the case back to the Superior Court, where the trial judge had held against the Goodridges. She instructed the trial judge to wait 180 days and then issue an Order in accordance with her opinion. Nothing will happen on May 17 until that judge issues an Order.

What are the “tens of thousands” planning?
Under Article 98 of the Mass. Constitution, written by John Adams in 1780, any judge can be removed by a simple majority of each chamber of the Legislature. This is not “impeachment,” which is a complicated process with many lawyers involved. With “removal,” each Representative and Senator votes his conscience without having to prove anything except to himself. There is no place for a legislator to hide. The vote must take place before May 17. Marshall demonstrated many times after being appointed as Chief in 1999 that she favored homosexual marriage. If she had excused herself, as was required, it would have been a 3-3 tie.

Will that end it?
Yes! Margaret Marshall and her three friends will be gone and so will gay marriage. The three judges who passionately dissented from Marshall’s opinion will be running the court. In time, four more judges will be appointed by the Governor.

Will you try to put the Goodridges in jail?
Of course not, that is hateful propaganda. If the Goodridges enjoy having sex with each other, they should be allowed to do so. Besides, it is impossible to stop them even if anyone wanted to. On the other hand, mutual masturbation should not be glorified as a wonderful practice for our children.

“Poster-girls” for a happy life?
The Goodridges appear to be nice, intelligent people, but the eight-year-old daughter of Hillary, conceived by artificial insemination, is already showing turmoil. That’s why Julie and Hillary are seeking “marriage.” They say it will solve the girl’s confusion, not realizing that it will intensify as she grows older and “discovers” males, with whom she has no intimate contact. Her “mothers” are unknowingly using this child as a pawn in their own struggle in life.

See “Libel by New York Times” by Atty. J. Edward Pawlick for a full discussion.

URGE YOUR REPS & SENATORS TO REMOVE JUSTICE MARSHALL. CALL GOV. ROMNEY.

 

 

 

 

 

 


HOME
Make MassNews Your Home Page

© Copyright 2004 Massachusetts News. All Rights Reserved.

Archives  |  Letters  |  Bookshop
About Us    |  Local Papers  |   Selected Sites  |  Government