Globe/Times Hopes to Ignore Book by Atty. Pawlick, Wishes It Will Quietly Disappear; If Forced to Confront It, They Will Classify It as Internet "Conspiracy" Hysteria
MN Staff
February 2, 2004

   The Boston Globe/NYTimes complex indicated in its Sunday edition yesterday that it will attempt to ignore the book, "Libel by New York Times," by J. Edward Pawlick, attorney for Mass. Citizens for Marriage, which reveals that gay marriage did not just happen in Massachusetts, it was plotted and planned by the media giant.

   "The many friends who worried that I will be sued for libel by the giants should not be troubled," says Atty. Pawlick. "None of those who plotted against us want to give this story any publicity at all. They don't want the truth to come to light." According to the lawyer, that includes:

-- Arthur O. Sulzberger, Jr. (Pinch), who is the Chairman of the Times conglomerate, and the man who originally plotted to impose gay marriage here.

-- Chief Justice Margaret Marshall, the wife of Sulzberger's employee, columnist Anthony Lewis, who plotted with Sulzberger.

-- U.S. District Court judge Patti Sarris, who dismissed the lawsuit of MCM against the Times and the Globe, even though she knew she was doing wrong. She is a former employee of Ted Kennedy, who appointed her to the bench.

   Impartial Section on Globe Website

   The Globe published an "impartial" section for its website yesterday that presumably will be a permanent addition to the site. Although a large, front-page story was obviously intended to announce the new section, someone forgot to even mention it in the print edition.

   The front-page story, "On unions, a division," continued the Globe's agenda that the debate is only between gay marriage or civil unions, says Pawlick.

   "There is no other choice, according to them," says Pawlick. "They never tell anyone that 'gay marriage' and 'civil unions' are the same thing. Allowing civil unions is not a compromise, as they attempt to portray. This is just more of Pinch Sulzberger's plan to impose gay marriage across the country. Everyone knows that civil unions will morph into gay marriage in a few years. It's just the first step."

   In its Opinion section, the Globe printed a story about conspiracies titled: "Conspiracy theory was born in the Age of Enlightenment and has metastasized in the Age of the Internet. Why won't it go away?"

   Pawlick said in response: "It's going to be difficult for the tens of thousands of Massachusetts supporters who signed the Protection of Marriage Amendment in 2001, including its president, my wife, Sally Pawlick, to believe they were agents of hysteria and the Globe/Times complex didn't really libel them.

   "Pinch Sulzberger may be able to peddle that lie somewhere, but not here in Massachusetts because everyone saw the Globe encourage Tom Birmingham to break the law. They saw it libel the good people at MCM, at Massachusetts Family Institute and the Catholic Church."

   Discouraged Reading of SJC Opinion by Making it 161 Pages Long

   The total number of pages in the SJC opinions on gay marriage was only 35, but the Globe made it 161-pages long on its web site, much too much for any average person to print.

   This was part of the Globe's continuing effort to stop anyone from reading the brilliant dissents of the 3-3 divided court, which made Margaret Marshall cast a vote for herself in her failed attempt to get a unanimous court.

   "The paper will say that it acted fairly by printing the entire text of the opinions," says Pawlick, "but I knew from experience they would not be fair. And sure enough, everyone knows that practically no one would print a document that had been made to be 161-pages, some of the pages almost totally blank, and the whole thing being double-spaced."

   Although the Globe did print some excerpts from the three dissenters, they were so well hidden that they were almost impossible to find, Pawlick says.

   Zeroes In On Religious Aspects of Coalition

   The Globe naturally zeroed in on the religious aspects of the hastily arranged Coalition for Marriage, as Atty. Pawlick had predicted. The Coalition is the brainchild of Focus on the Family, which for some reason, has imposed itself upon the state as our "leader." The Globe listed all the members of the Focus coalition, noting that they are all members of the "religious right."

   This is exactly as Atty. Pawlick predicted, noting that the only organization that has attempted to unite everyone in favor of marriage, whether religious or secular, is Mass. Citizens for Marriage. "That's another reason the Globe would like to ignore us," says Pawlick, "but it is our duty to see that they can't."

   Much More on Globe Website

   The Globe has much more on its new Internet site, much more than you want to read about. If you desire to see more of Pinch Sulzberger's newest propaganda effort, you can easily do so. It will be interesting to persons who are involved in this effort.