LIBEL by New York Times

by J. Edward Pawlick

Reserve Yours Now!

Section I - New York Times Sued for Libel by Massachusetts Citizens for Marriage and Sally Pawlick.
In April 2003, the New York Times and its subsidiary, the Boston Globe, were sued for libel by Sally Pawlick and MCM. The Times had committed libel in order to defeat the Protection of Marriage Amendment. The suit by Pawlick and MCM was dismissed in August 2003 by a federal judge before she even sat down in her Boston courtroom. She had formerly worked for Ted Kennedy. The lawyers and mystery buffs will enjoy this chapter, but others may want to move on. Before doing so, they should look at Chapter 6, which is basically a speech to a jury about how the New York Times violated Free Speech. This intrigue was all done under the direction of Times' Chairman Pinch Sulzberger, who used his enormous power to libel Pawlick and MCM and then to illegally interfere in the workings of the government of the state of Massachusetts.

Section II - Where Did the Mysterious Blockers Come From? Who Stopped Voters from Signing Petitions at Shopping Malls Across the State and Illegally Violated Voting Rights of Many Citizens?
Would you believe it was the ACLU who was enthusiastically training these people throughout 2001? There are many pictures included of the blockers in action, taken by hidden cameras. The Globe never reported any of this illegal action by their friends.

Section III - Masterminds of Fraud Hoax Were Uncovered
Blockers were unable to stop voters from meeting in neighborhoods and churches. They enthusiastically sailed way over the top in signatures. That's when Pinch got desperate and began to libel those who favored the Amendment. He said they obtained their signatures fraudulently by tricking people who were trying to sign a petition about horses. His Boston Globe printed these libelous stories over-and-over, but it didn't work either. Then Pinch ran a big story in a Sunday edition of the Times which went to 1.5 million people nationwide in April 2002. That didn't work either. Then the Globe began to give false, inaccurate information that the President of the state Senate, Tom Birmingham, could legally kill the Marriage Amendment all by himself. Over 200 upset citizens swarmed the Legislature in June in a rare display to protest the illegal actions advanced by the Globe. Over 500 distraught and angry people came in July when the legislature adjourned without taking a vote as mandated by the state Constitution. Those people have not gone away.

Section IV - Why Is This Dysfunctional Family Leading the World?
The New York Times has been managed like a family-owned shoe store ever since Adolph Ochs, an enterprising young man from Chattanooga, bought it on a shoestring in 1896. He lived until 1935, doing well until about 1914 when his only child, a daughter named Iphigene, became interested in men and running the newspaper. Her husband, Arthur Sulzberger, who was liberal but not as radical as Iphigene, was not Adolph's first choice to succeed him. His conservative nephew was his choice, but he couldn't hurt Iphigene's feelings. The dilemma made him a nervous wreck and he never did solve it. When he died, his daughter and her husband, a womanizer who had married only for money and power, took control, but not before Arthur had a coronary occlusion in 1932 which left him with a left hand that was permanently incapable of bearing weight. The illness came from the stress of competing for the job. The couple ran the paper until April 1964 when Arthur again became ill and had to quit.
Then the husband of Iphigene's oldest child ran it for two years until stress got to him at 51 and he died of heart problems. Then Iphigene's only son, Punch Sulzberger, who was dyslectic and had difficulty in reading anything, took charge. But he had common sense and stayed out of the way of the news department, building a thriving business.
Chapter 16 wonders, "Why Is This Dysfunctional Family Leading the World?"

Section V - Is Pinch an Extremist?
THIS IS WHAT YOU WILL BE WAITING TO READ.
IT SHOWS HOW TO DEFEAT PINCH SULZBERGER AND MARGARET MARSHALL.

Punch and his son, Pinch are two extremists on homosexuality. The father is a homophobe. He forced the paper to ignore the growing presence of homosexuals until he, himself, was forced to recognize them, too late to have an impact on a commonsense course. He did this because his mother, Iphigene, lived to age 97, still with a tremendous liberal/radical influence on the news that was reported in the paper, but dead-set against homosexuals.

Pinch is infatuated with homosexuals. Ever since he arrived at the paper in 1984, he has courted them and sneakily gone behind his father's back to do special favors for them. Pinch has hurt the newspaper terribly in the eyes of the national press. It has become fodder for late-night shows since the tragedy about Jayson Blair last year.
Pinch's huge victory in gay marriage could very well be his demise as this book becomes more public. His father may bring him back home and spank him. Pinch's alliance with Chief Justice Marshall, who is married to the premiere columnist of the Times, Anthony Lewis, will prove to be a disaster for them both. The three strongest, smartest members of the SJC all voted against Marshall, giving her a razor-thin 4-3 victory. The obvious chicanery of both Pinch and Margaret will be outed in the ensuing six months before the Legislature has to act upon her demands.

Call your state representative and tell them how you feel.

I want to order LIBEL by New York Times

Back to Introduction