Pillars Of A Constitutional Marriage Amendment
By Paul M. Weyrich
November 25, 2003
I have done a host of media interviews over this past
week on the ruling by
the Massachusetts Supreme Court on so called gay marriage.
Every single
reporter asked the same thing. Will gay marriage be an issue in
the 2004
elections?
The answer is not a simple one. First, it depends
on who the Democratic
nominee is and what position he takes on the issue.
Secondly, it depends on the Bush Administration and
what it is willing to
say about the matter next year.
Thirdly, it depends on the Congress and what action
might be forthcoming in
the form of a Constitutional amendment.
Fourthly, it depends on the pro-family coalition and
just how much effort it
is willing to put into a national debate on the issue.
Most of the Democrats running, with the exception
of the lowest tier
candidates (Dennis Kucinich, Carol Mosely Braun and Al Sharpton)
say while
they support Vermont-style civil unions they oppose gay marriage.
The test
for some of them will be when they have to vote on a Constitutional
amendment on that issue. If they vote no on a Constitutional
amendment, it
will be hard for them to credibly maintain that they are against
gay
marriage.
The Bush Administration is not terribly comfortable
with the issue. The
President is a genuine compassionate conservative and does not want
to come
across as overly harsh. The President needs to be reminded that
it is
possible to hate the sin and love the sinner. Practicing sodomy
is still a
sin, the U.S. Supreme Court notwithstanding. It is not necessary
to stand in
judgment of anyone by taking a strong stand that, as Governor Mitt
Romney of
Massachusetts has made clear, is in tune with thousands of years
of recorded
history.
It is not clear what Congress will do. Senators are
considering language for
a Constitutional amendment that would make it clear that civil unions
are
not marriage as well as insisting that true marriage is between
one man and
one woman. Senators are interested in the strongest language possible
but
have made it clear to the pro-family movement that they want to
pass an
amendment. They are not just involved with this issue for the purpose
of a
debate. Surprisingly, one Senator who really wants to move on an
amendment
is Gordon Smith of Oregon. It is interesting that Mormons on both
coasts,
elected in the most liberal states in the nation, are showing real
leadership on the issue.
As to the pro-family movement, some are serious about
passing an amendment.
Others such as Bill Bennett, say we should have a national debate
in lieu of
Congressional action unless we can get Congress to outlaw civil
unions and
not just gay marriage.
My guess is that if Constitutional amendments begin to move in Congress,
the
pro-family movement will likely get behind them. The question is
how much
behind them? Some leaders say that their people wont go all
out unless the
strongest possible language is being pushed. Others believe if their
leadership blesses the Congressional action, their folks will go
along.
The pro-family coalition, which includes such diverse
groups as the Southern
Baptists and the Knights of Columbus, has powerhouse potential.
Rev. Don
Wildmon, whose ministry includes the ownership and operation of
a couple
hundred radio stations, has said that when the pro-family movement
is
united, it is a force for good that cant be outdone by even
the very
powerful homosexual lobby.
Right now, public opinion is rising against gay marriage.
About 60% are
saying they oppose it. Among those who attend church regularly,
the number
is upwards of 80%. Intensity most often determines the outcome in
the
political process. The homosexual lobby is intense on this issue.
So is the
pro-family community. This will be a test for the pro-family coalition.
Do
they believe in the family strong enough to go all out to defeat
those
forces determined to destroy the family as we know it?
God is on our side, one of the leaders
of the movement intoned at a recent
meeting. Taking a leaf from Ronald Reagan, I told her and the group,
Better
we should worry that were on Gods side. I believe
in this instance we
are, and if that is the case perhaps we will be able to enlist His
power to
help us along. It is going to take Gods strength and power
for right to
prevail.
Paul M. Weyrich is Chairman and CEO of the Free
Congress Foundation.
|