|
|
Public Policy
Questions On Ballot In North Attleboro and Franklin
By Ed Oliver
September 2002 Print Edition
State Senate Candidate
Earl Henry Sholley and other volunteers collected
enough signatures at the last minute to place two
Public Policy Questions on the ballot in North Attleboro,
and one in Franklin.
A Public Policy Question is non-binding and is directed
at a particular state Rep. or Senator in the District.
The Question on the ballot asks voters if the State
Rep. or Senator shall be instructed to vote a certain
way on an issue, and is a useful tool to communicate
the interests of the voting public.
Full Disclosure
On The Budget
The first Question
deals with full disclosure on the budget and also
addresses unfunded mandates. It will be on the ballot
in North Attleboro and Franklin. It is directed at
the respective State Reps. Betty Poirier and Jim Vallee.
Sholley told MassNews, "The tax dollar question
is in two parts. First, it directs the State Rep.
to vote for legislation that would give the average
citizen a budget breakdown in layperson's terms so
we can all understand it, so we don't need to hire
an accounting firm or a battery of lawyers to decipher
the budget. I want a full breakdown. I want to know
how much the incumbent, my opponent is spending on
pizzas, I want to know how much money it takes to
run a full-time legislature as opposed to a part-time
legislature. I want to know how much money is spent
on overtime. I want to know how much money goes to
furniture up at the State House.
"For example, if we are in a budget crisis, why
are they still remodeling the State House and bringing
in new furniture? I want to know all these things.
If we have a thirty billion-dollar pension fund, I
want to know how much of that money is actually paid
out every year. How much of that money goes to pensioners
each year and what's left over? It seems to me that
we might have a ton of money there that could be quite
a rainy day fund for other things or it should be
returned to the taxpayers. We need to know this in
layperson's terms. The process has gotten too complicated
They hide too much of our money.
"The other part of that Question, which a lot
of people really like, is that any mandates that come
down from the State House would have to be fully funded
by the state. In other words, this business about,
say for example Chapter 766 Special Ed. has placed
an undue burden, that and many other laws have placed
an undue burden on the cities and towns of this Commonwealth."
Shared Parenting
The second Public
Policy Question is mirrored after House Bill 2546
dealing with Presumptive Shared Custody, and will
only be on the ballot in North Attleboro because of
time restraints in gathering signatures.
The Question instructs Rep.Poirier to vote in favor
of legislation mandating that in all separation and
divorce proceedings involving minor children, both
parents have an inalienable right to share temporary
and final legal custody of the children, and the children
have the right to reside and spend an equal amount
of time with each parent. If equal time is not practical
or possible, the right to a minimum amount of time
per year for one parent shall be established and protected
by the courts.
"This is a big issue for fathers and children
and families-grandparents as well," said Sholley.
"This affects a lot of people. Fathers are routinely
discriminated against in the Family Court here in
Massachusetts. This would level the playing field.
Over thirty-some states have a presumptive shared
custody or minimum visitation legislation, plus the
District of Columbia. It's high time that Massachusetts
gets in line with the rest of the country because
it is in the best interest of the children."
|
|