Westminster Man's Groundbreaking
Domestic Violence Study To Get Exposure
By Ed Oliver
September 6, 2002
A groundbreaking study of Restraining
Orders by a Westminster man shatters feminist myths
about domestic violence. The findings will be presented
at a major family violence conference in California
this month and is scheduled to be published in a future
edition of the Journal of Family Violence.
Steve Basile, 41, tells Massachusetts
News that few people have attempted to conduct this
type of politically incorrect research before, and
he is glad that future authors and researchers will
be able to use his data to begin to correct the falsehoods
that permeate conventional wisdom about domestic violence.
Basile spent four years studying nearly
400 Restraining Orders issued by Gardner District
Court in 1997.
The first phase of the study examined
the degree of the abuse and/or violence allegedly
perpetrated by both male and female defendants in
209A restraining order cases.
Basile found that female defendants
were just as abusive as male defendants in terms of
both physical and psychological aggression.
The results fly in the face of feminist
orthodoxy on which the domestic violence industry
has been built.
"Domestic violence is time and
time again painted exclusively as something male batterers
do to their innocent female victims," said Basile.
"Our laws, policies and practices unfortunately
reflect this myth."
The second phase examined the court's
response to requests for protection. The results showed
that despite the gender-neutral language in the law,
the court's response highly favored the female plaintiffs.
Basile's research has withstood review
by an academic journal, but it will be more than a
year before it gets published. He told Massachusetts
News that in order to get his results into the mainstream
more quickly, he will present his papers at the 2002
Family Violence Conference in San Diego, CA on September
27.
The conference attendees will include
a spectrum of the domestic violence industry, such
as social workers, psychologists, nurses, military
personnel, attorneys, law enforcement, researchers,
advocates, marriage & family therapists, policy-makers,
physicians, shelter & crisis center staff, survivors,
etc.
Basile's research initiative gained
notoriety in March 1999 after Jane Doe, Inc, a feminist
"battered women's" advocacy organization,
lobbied key legislators to stop the research. Attorney
General Thomas Reilly filed legislation designed to
pull all contact information found on 209A restraining
orders out of the public domain, making domestic violence
surveys nearly impossible for those researchers who
lacked special access to victims. However, victims
already had the power to keep their information secret
if they chose ("impounding the file") by
simply checking a checkbox on the 209A request form.
The bill is now law and Basile says
it will most likely have a chilling effect on the
type of research that can be conducted by those researchers
who question current law and policy.
The intense pressure forced the Gardner
researchers to shut down a planned third phase of
the research initiative, which involved a phone survey
of litigants. The researchers intended to query both
plaintiffs and defendants regarding their overall
satisfaction with the process, if they felt the protection
orders reduced or escalated tensions, to determine
who initiated attacks, as well as other key characteristics
not found in the official court record.
Steve Basile is a software engineer who resides with
his wife Clara and two children in Westminster Massachusetts.
He has an undergraduate degree in Computer Science
and a Masters Degree in Mathematics. He has been co-director
of the North Central Chapter of the Fatherhood Coalition
for the past five years.