Sen. Antonioni Says Adjourning
Without a Vote on Marriage Was 'Unfair'
By MassNews Staff
August 2, 2002
Senator Antonioni
Sen. Robert A. Antonioni (D) has told
a group of constituents he voted to adjourn the Constitutional
Convention on July 17 without a vote on the Marriage
Amendment because he knew that a large majority of
the legislature was going to vote that way.
He feared that if he voted differently,
it would be widely interpreted as a vote in favor
of the Amendment.
It was pointed out to the Senator that
that was putting his career and worries about perceptions
ahead of the clear right of the people to vote on
this issue. It was also pointed out that he pulled
the rug out from people who had worked hard for over
two long years, who followed the law and the process.
Sen. Antonioni nodded and said, "I
know. It's unfair."
Refused to Take Surveys
The Senator, who is a Democrat
from Leominster, Worcester County, refused to
take the Survey from Mass. Citizens for Marriage.
"This is typical of most
legislators," said Sarah McVay Pawlick,
President of MCM. "They know there is no
defense against their violating the state Constitution
on July 17 and they are embarrassed."
Antonioni told his constituents
he does not feel comfortable filling out surveys.
He said that the questions from interest groups
are usually "loaded" but he was willing
to discuss the issue. He would not say what
in the MCM survey was "loaded."
He agreed with the core message
in the MCM survey that a child having a mother
and a father is the ideal.
Gov.
Michael Dukakis tells MassNews that the people
should be allowed to vote.
He said he had received calls from constituents
who favored the Amendment, including his own mother.
But he told his mother that this was not a vote he
could make.
He is opposed to the Amendment because
he thought it went way too far. He insisted the Amendment
is poorly worded, saying the courts might interpret
it in a way that was
probably not intended.
He commented that we probably will never
have "gay marriages" in Massachusetts. He
said that despite his conservative upbringing and
constituency, he has learned not to be
"judgmental" of gays, although he was unable
to say why he thought this was a gay issue or why
the Amendment would be "judgmental" against
anyone.
He also did not explain how he could
judge the 130,000 citizens, including his own mother,
who signed the petition for the Amendment. How could
he possibly judge them and say that they were "judgmental?"
He will not ask Senator Birmingham to
reconsider his illegal actions.
"We know that every legislator
on Beacon Hill, including Sen. Antonioni, was visited
by lobbyists from the AFL-CIO and pressured to vote
illegally and stop the vote on the Amendment,"
said Mrs. Pawlick. "They were given no choice.
This was a pressure vote that came from Sen. Birmingham
and the hierarchy. Sen. Antonioni was not allowed
to vote his conscience.
"We do not know why the union quietly
did this behind the scenes without the knowledge of
their members, who are solidly in favor of the measure.
But someone must have profited greatly as a result."
Mrs. Pawlick said she is sending Sen.
Antonioni a copy of John F. Kennedy's classic book,
Profiles in Courage, in which Kennedy wrote about
the heroic qualities of eight U.S. Senators. JFK wrote
that the book was "about the most admirable of
human virtues--courage." Mrs. Pawlick said that
Sen. Antonioni appears to be a good person and we
should all learn more about the important virtue of
courage.
"Perhaps, when the Senator
gets a chance later this year to vote again on the
issue, he will have the courage to change his vote,
as will many of his colleagues," she said.
Below: Outraged
Letter from Constituent
Dear Sen. Antonioni
I was present at the State House
July 17 and am both saddened and
outraged at the conduct of my elected representatives.
Please don't bother giving me
your excuses for your vote by explaining how
this initiative would remove civil rights for
a class of people.
If medical insurance and probate
matters, etc. are a concern for the gay community
they can draft legislation and attempt to change
the law in the normal fashion.
The correct solution is not
to redefine marriage, the institution that has
been with humanity for centuries and is the
cultutal expression of facts of nature that
were two billion years in the making (that would
be sexual reproduction for the survival of the
species and the evolution of life).
As you well know, the courts
in our state are poised to redefine marriage
by judicial fiat. There needs to be a statutory
or constitutional change to ensure that marriage
remains as it has always been.
Unions between homosexuals or
any other combination of humans does not
belong on the same plateau as the biological
union of one man one woman. This is something
the people wish to decide,
and they have taken the proper steps as designed
by our democratic process to do exactly that.
You and your brethren who voted
for adjournment have openly defied the people
and the democratic process. The good people
of the commonwealth have had all they can take
of the political correctness forced upon them.
A change is in the wind. Stick your finger in
the wind and feel which way the wind is blowing,
Senator.
Mark Charalambous
10 Abbey Road #205
Leominster, MA 01453