|
Opinion:
The Propaganda of Matthew Shepard
Liberals
go for Jugular Vein
Return
to lead story
March
11, 2002
It
wasn’t until the lies about Matthew Shepard surfaced, in an attempt
to crush anyone who was not a liberal, that I acquired any interest
in homosexuality. Before that, I was as unconcerned as anyone even
though we conservatives were being challenged, “big time.”
The
lies finally got my attention when the New Bedford Standard Times
published a story in October 1998 about, The
long, sorry history of Christian bigotry continues unabated.
This
aroused my curiosity.
It
caused me to research the story of Matthew Shepard. Was the Standard
Times accurate in its denunciation of Christian leaders in America?
After only a few days of research, it was readily apparent that
what the New Bedford paper wrote was a tissue of lies. What had
happened to Shepard was a grotesque tragedy, but grotesque tragedies
happen to many people every day.
This
lie refuses to die because the Boston Globe and its parent, the
New York Times, work very hard to keep it alive.
It
reappeared again in the Living Arts section of the Globe last Thursday.
The front page was almost totally about “folk hero” and “hate crime
victim,” Matthew Shepard.
In
the next-to-last paragraph of the very long story, the author of
an empathetic book about Shepard is quoted, “I still don’t feel
I understand what happened that night. I don’t think anybody does.
I don’t think [the killers] can really explain to themselves what
they did with any absolute certainty.”
And
in the last paragraph, a man who produced a play and a drama which
will appear on Channel 2 was quoted: “[The author] agrees [with
the above quote], but believes that appropriating and simplifying
tragedy is a necessity. ‘Anything that becomes devoured by the mass
culture in which we live suffers from the process,’ he says. ‘At
the same time, it encouraged dialogue on a national level. And that
is more important.’”
In
other words, “Sure it’s propaganda and not reality. But the lie
serves my purpose.”
The
Truth
The
truth about Matthew Shepard is that he went to a bar and left with
two psychopaths who were out to rob him. After they robbed and murdered
him, leaving him tied to a fence, they returned to town and attacked
two other straight men, hitting one of them with a pistol and opening
a wound in his head which required 22 stitches to close. They stopped
only when one of the others hit one of them with a stick, giving
him a hair-line skull fracture.
Although
the killing occurred on the 6th of October, it was not
immediately reported by the Boston Globe or its owner, the New York
Times.
Meanwhile,
on October 8th, an organization known as “People for
the American Way” (a brainstorm of Norman Lear who became rich from
the Archie Bunker and The Jeffersons TV shows) published a ten-page
attack against the major Christian organizations which had started
a “Truth in Love” campaign about many homosexuals who had been successful
in changing their lifestyles.
The
“Truth in Love” campaign was characterized as “hate” by the Lear
organization. Its headline was Religious
Right’s ‘Lying About Love’ Campaign. This October 8 report from
Lear was immediately given by them to the major media and all of
Lear’s allies.
As
a result, on October 10th, both the Boston Globe and
the New York Times suddenly began to report this obscure tragedy
from Wyoming.
They
reported, as Lear recommended, that the incident was caused by the
advertisement which ran across the country earlier in the year which
said, We’re standing for
the truth that homosexuals can change.
This
simple statement by the Christian groups, which was buttressed by
the truth that many homosexuals have changed their lives, was said
to be “hateful” speech that had brought about a climate which caused
those two killers in Wyoming to kill Matthew Shepard. It was because
of the “Truth in Love” campaign that Matthew Shepard was murdered.
This
was obviously a spin that was preposterous but the mainstream media
repeated it over and over and continues to do so until this day.
A
few weeks after the murder on October 16, the NY Times reported
under the headline, Men Held in Beating Lived on the Fringes, that the two men had had
serious problems with the law and with mayhem long before Matthew
Shepherd came along. Their entanglement with him was nothing new
to their disordered lives.
On
the other side, there are many stories of innocent boys who have
been grotesquely murdered by homosexuals. We have one right here
in Newton. Why isn’t the Boston Globe concerned about preventing
the gruesome story about little Jeffrey Curley (right in the Globe’s
own backyard) from happening again?
Prosecutors
say the killers were sexually obsessed with young Jeffrey. They
lured him from his neighborhood with the promise of a new bike.
When he resisted, they smothered him with a gasoline-soaked rag.
The
two men molested and murdered the boy before stuffing his body
into a concrete-filled container and dumping it in a Maine
river.
The
story of Matthew Shepard is very sad but why is it more tragic than
what happened to 10-year-old Jeffrey Curley?
Hate
from ‘People for American Way’
The
report from P.A.W. started with the statement, “Anti-gay hatred
is a staple of Religious Right organizations and figures.”
Then
the President of P.A.W.’s foundation was quoted, “If this campaign
is about truth or love, then George Orwell must be its honorary
chairman.”
As
proof, it quoted a mayoral candidate in Springdale, Arkansas, who
said, “Homosexuals are perverts….I will do everything I can do to
keep them out of Springdale.” Even in Arkansas, he was not elected.
It
also cited a “Christian” radio talk-show host in Costa Mesa, California,
as saying, “Lesbian love, sodomy are viewed by God as being detestable
and abominable. Civil magistrates are to put people to death who
practice these things.”
It
would be nice to hear from anyone
in their right mind who believes that any
Christian believes that garbage!!
It’s
no wonder that the people at P.A.W. see hate everywhere when they
are so obsessed with it themselves?
|